Lawmakers Demand Wray Correct the Record
Republicans Call Out Dems for Latest Trump Conspiracy Theory
An Honorary Squad Member Runs for President
Biden Justice Department Agrees to a Disgraceful Settlement With Lisa Page and Peter...
Harris Finally Nabs One Crucial But Expected Endorsement
What Trump Told Netanyahu at Mar-a-Lago
Another Day Another Fresh Lie in the Press About Kamala's Past
Speaker Mike Johnson Puts Kamala Harris' Border Failures on Full Display
Trump Announces Plans to Return to the Site of His Would-Be Assassination
Is Gavin Newsom's Latest PR Stunt a Way to Secure Himself a Seat...
Kamala Harris Sits Down With Drag Pro-Palestine Advocates While Boycotting Netanyahu’s Vis...
Kamala Harris' Roadmap to the White House Left Out a Very Crucial Aspect
Dave McCormick's Ad Tying Bob Casey Jr to Kamala Harris Will Run During...
Why One Name Being Considered for the Trump Assassination Attempt Task Force Is...
Was Kamala Harris Complicit in Covering Up for Joe Biden? This Poll Is...
Tipsheet

Just the Facts, Please

Judge Sotomayor's 60% reversal rate by the Supreme Court is remarkable.  In other words, more than half of the times that she wrote a majority opinion that went to the Supremes on appeal, the highest court in the land said she had gotten it wrong.
Advertisement


There are only two reasons that a judge gets reversed that much.  Either s/he doesn't understand the law, or else refuses to apply it correctly.  It's hard to believe that Judge Sotomayor truly couldn't figure out the law in each of these cases.  Instead, her high reversal rate suggests a willingness-- like that manifested by the oft-reversed Ninth Circuit -- to use the law as an instrument to make policy.

It's worth pointing out that, as a justice, she'll have the chance to do successfully what she apparently tried to do before -- make law from the bench.  There is nothing to constrain a Supreme Court justice in his or her work but an internal commitment to upholding the rule of law -- which means (among other things) pledging impartiality toward litigants, and realizing that the work of judges (even those on the Supreme Court) is supposed to be to interpret the law as it is written, not to rewrite it so as to make it more to their personal liking.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement