You Can't Do That: Florida Officer Arrests Man Who Vandalized Car With Anti-Biden...
The Pro-Hamas Antics on College Campuses Are Starting to Make Dems Nervous
Trump’s VP Pick Should Be Someone Who Has Never Admitted to Shooting a...
Pro-Israel and Pro-Hamas Protesters at the University of Alabama Did Agree on One...
Try This Crap In A Red State
Demeaning, Diminishing, Destroying
House COVID Panel Recommends EcoHealth Alliance President Be Criminally Investigated
Campus Protests: Switch Out the Word 'Jew' and Replace It With 'Black'
Will the Students Globalize the Intifada?
White House, Gun Control Groups’ Trojan Horse
Protests and Policy as Porn
Will California Hobble the US Railroad Industry?
Philadelphia Court Forced Jewish Doctor to Choose Between Faith and Justice
Bipartisan Bill to Protect Children from Social Media Is Back
What These Pro-Hamas Protests Tell Us About America’s Judeo-Christian Heritage
Tipsheet

Saying One Thing, Doing Another

According to this piece by Amir Taheri in The New York Post, Barack privately tried to prevail on the Iraqis to delay any agreement about withdrawing American troops
Advertisement
 -- even as he publicly called for that same withdrawal. 

The reason is obvious, isn't it?  After all, it's much more difficult to stoke widespread anger and discontent about our troops serving in Iraq if the successful end of that service is somehow in sight.  If troops can come home because the mission has worked, it also makes it much harder to argue that the surge failed -- as Barack had predicted.

Even so, it's revealing of his character that he'd try to demand a delay in troop withdrawal agreements for his own political benefit.  What's more, his latest proposed withdrawal date, 2010, would be impossible to meet if agreements were delayed as he requested.

But what does he care?  He'd be President by then . . . or not.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement