This Answer From ActBlue's CEO Threw This GOP Rep for a Loop
Here's What Karmelo Anthony's Mother Said Outside the Courthouse Following Her Son's Guilt...
Why the GOP Baseball Team Told Biden He Could Visit Their Dugout Whenever...
California Just Showed Why Gun Control Is Racist
You Won't Believe the Sentence This Former Mayor Got for Sleeping With a...
Trump Blasts 'Radical Left Dumocrats' for Taking National Security Hostage Over FISA
Trump's State Department Is Cracking Down on This Birthright Citizenship Scam
Here's What Victor Davis Hanson Has to Say About Graham Platner's Victory in...
Rep. Ro Khanna Just Went All-In on Graham Platner
A Hilton-Pratt Dream Team? Steve Hilton Says He's All In.
President Trump Just Revealed What the United States Is Doing With Seized Iranian...
Trump DHS Moves to Expedite the Deportations of Illegal Aliens Found to Have...
Democrats' Struggle With Men Reflects a Deeper Cultural Disconnect
Here's How Much Oil Went Through the Strait of Hormuz Under a 'Secret...
Philadelphia Teachers Just Admitted the Real Reason Behind the Failure of the Public...
Tipsheet

The MSM's Biased Hypocrisy on Palin

The MSM's Biased Hypocrisy on Palin
Many in the MSM, perhaps alarmed by the energized and enthusiastic response to Governor Palin, have been working overtime to insinuate that her status as a mom renders her somehow unfit to serve on the McCain ticket.
Advertisement


As Matt points out below, there's the Campbell Brown-Tucker Bounds exchange on the topic of Bristol Palin.  And last week on CNN, Newbusters flagged a remarkable commentary by John Roberts, suggesting that Governor Palin's service might adversely impact her youngest child.

If longtime social traditionalists had raised these concerns about a liberal woman, they'd have been shouted down, ridiculed and completely marginalized.  Since at least the '70's, we've been told again and again that it's unfair to consider a woman's children in considerations about who is the most qualified for any particular professional position.

People of good faith can debate whether this is a good thing.  After all, it does suggest that a significant presence of a child's mother isn't particularly important or necessary.  And when -- as Dana Bash responds in the John Roberts exchange above -- people point out that Joe Biden wouldn't be asked such questions about his family situation, it certainly plays into the whole idea that there are no inherent differences between men and women and that fathers and mothers are essentially interchangeable.

So as I say, people of good faith can hold their own opinions on any of that.  But what's so despicable is that, after years of spouting the feminist line without any critical thought, all of a sudden the MSM has adopted a social traditionalist line that it would treat with vituperative scorn in any other context.  And they're clearly doing it for political reasons -- making the attacks the Obama camp would, if it dared.
Advertisement


In my view, if the feminist movement meant anything, it meant that women were entitled to shape their own professional and personal destinies -- and to decide for themselves what kind of work commitment they could undertake in light of the unique needs and issues in their own individual families.  By all accounts, Governor Palin has done an excellent job as Alaska's chief executive.  And that's where press and public concern when it comes to voting properly lies.

Any concerns about the impact of Governor Palin's service on her family are hers and her husband's alone.  And to the extent that the MSM argues anything to the contrary, they are completely contradicting everything for which they have professed to stand over the last three decades.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos