How You Know This Major Newspaper Doesn't Feel Good About Kamala
Latest Poll of Young Black and Latino Male Voters Has to Embarrass Dems
Kamala's Insane Talking Points
Jake Tapper Demeans Gold Star Family, and the Press Attempts Another Failed October...
Donald Trump, Class Traitor Par Excellence
Conservation Is on the Ballot in Three States This Year
CNN's Town Hall Leans into Boosting Kamala
The Democratic Party's Bad October
Kamala Is the Bigger Threat to the Constitutional Order
Democrats Attack Free Speech—Again
America’s International Decline Can No Longer Be Ignored
Trump's Rosebud 2024: An Insurrection or a Resurrection?
Mysterious CCP Supply Chains are Cause for Concern
Wall Street Places Its Bet on Trump, and We Couldn't Agree More
Kamala Opposed Anti-Gang Measure That Californians Overwhelmingly Supported
Tipsheet

Call Off the Gender Police!

A piece in the Raleigh News-Observer discusses whether Hillary Clinton is being "dissed" unfairly because she's a woman.

For Heaven's sake.   Chances are, she is.  And there's nothing wrong with pointing it out -- after all the press should at least be
Advertisement
aspiring to cover all candidates fairly.

But the idea that every gender-related element can be removed from the coverage of Hillary Clinton's candidacy is as naive as expecting John McCain to receive "fair and balanced" treatment from The New York Times.

Put it this way.  If McCain can't handle the predictable MSM brickbats that will be thrown at any Republican candidate, he isn't ready to be President.  If Hillary and her supporters are going to melt down at every possibly sexist comment out there, then she isn't ready to be President.   It isn't a job for the thin-skinned.

After all, I hear that Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is a terrible sexist . . . worse even than the vast right wing conspiracy.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement