Trump Rallies Republicans on Capitol Hill
Pro-Hamas Supporters Seize Building With Cal State University President Inside
The West Is Sick of the New Woke Jihadism
Florida Newspaper Troubled by Florida Weather and The Atlantic Worries About a Leader...
Preserving the 'Farm' in Farm Bill
Maddow and Stelter Concoct Crazy Theories on Trump's Revenge
If You Don't Want To Be Killed, Don't Take Hostages
European 'Far Right' Issues a Stinging Rebuke to Elites
The American Troubles
The Numbers Don’t Lie: Americans’ Purchasing Power Is Down Under Biden
Run, Sleepy Joe, Run!
Trump Gets Positive Feedback After Floating Proposal of Eliminating Income Tax
ICE Chief Makes Shocking Admission About Illegal Immigrants
What's Up With Ukraine's 'Enemy List' of Conservatives?
Joe Biden's Housing Market Just Got Worse
Tipsheet

Please, Ladies, Lighten Up!

Remember the old joke? Q: How many feminists does it take to screw in a light bulb? A: That's not funny!!!

Today, it certainly comes to mind.  The Washington Post ombudsman has
Advertisement
criticized the paper for running a satiric op/ed by Charlotte Allen, which read, in part:

"I can't help it, but reading about such episodes of screaming, gushing and swooning [about Obama] makes me wonder whether women -- I should say 'we women,' of course -- aren't the weaker sex after all. Or even the stupid sex, our brains permanently occluded by random emotions, psychosomatic flailings and distraction by the superficial. . . . Depressing as it is, several of the supposed misogynist myths about female inferiority have been proven true." 

Apparently, the piece has elicited a firestorm of outrage from women.

It's time to lose the grievance mentality, ladies.  Most reasonable, conservative women would confess to the occasional twinge of impatience with the female contingent of Katie Couric-worshipping, Bill Clinton-supporting, Obama-swooning voters who aren't making political decisions based on policy, but because of their infatuation with Clinton's bad-boy charm or Barack's charisma.  If these women don't want to be ridiculed, please stop the press from writing about how they're supposedly influenced by phenomena like the wearing of an argyle sweater or earth tones, or whether one should appeal to women by being a "good father" archetype
Advertisement
, or an "alpha male."  It would also help if the people who peddle this nonsense are neither defined nor treated like women's "leaders" -- because they make all of us look far more ridiculous (and pathetic) than any op/ed ever could.

Women cannot have it both ways.  They can't claim that they're ready and able to "play with the big boys" and then melt down over an opinion piece (even if they did believe it was insulting -- how often, after all, are "pale males" rountinely belittled and demeaned?).  And this sort of hysterical outrage does nothing to dispel the stereotypes about women's emotional fragility, and the like, that the complaining women are deploring; they simply validate them, and then drive them underground where they flourish in the shade.

Would it be "sexist" for me respectfully to ask these ladies overcome by Allen's piece to lighten up?

Update:  And one more thing:  Why is it all right for women to dish it out -- Hillary Clinton saw fit to characterize an entire state as sexist, for example -- but then lose it when they're criticized? 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement