Here's What Happened During JD Vance's Appearance on The View
You'll Never Guess Why This Guy Burned a Cross in a Chicago Park
This Top SPLC Official Funneled Over $1 Million to Her Neo-Nazi Lover
Disgraced Judge Hannah Dugan's Motion to Escape Justice Is Denied
The Great Escape—Let Young Workers Out of Social Security
Here's What Was Just Revealed About One of the Alleged UFC Freedom 250...
There's a Ridiculous Bill Set to Make It's Way Through the California State...
One Israeli Strike Could Bring the New Iran Deal Crashing Down
Iran Will Be Allowed to Immediately Resume Selling Its Oil Under Latest Deal,...
Peer Review Exposes Fatal Flaws in Study That Claimed 'Anti-Trans' Laws Spiked Teen...
DOJ Charges 15 Antifa Members After Violence Against ICE in Minneapolis
School Pays $95,000 After Punishing Student for Charlie Kirk Tribute
How a Calmer Border Is Helping Better Fight New World Screwworm
Gay Adoptive Fathers Found Guilty of Sexually Abusing, Murdering 13-Month-Old Baby Boy
Hillary Clinton Torches Biden Over 'Terrible Mistake'
Tipsheet

Another Judge Blocks Trump Immigration Policy

Another Judge Blocks Trump Immigration Policy
AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta

An unelected federal Judge from New York has decided the Trump administration's new "public charge" rule won’t go into effect on Tuesday, Oct. 15th, as previously scheduled. The Hill is reporting that George Daniels, a U.S. District Court Judge in Manhattan, issued a preliminary injunction blocking the rule change from taking effect nationwide.

Advertisement

In August, the Trump administration announced a new “public charge” rule for immigrants seeking to enter the country or obtain a green card. Under the new rule, applicants who have received public-assistance benefits for a 12-month period within the last three years will be denied. Many immigrants take advantage of government-assistance programs like food stamps, housing vouchers, and Medicaid.

Despite the hysteria, public charge rules have been on the books for more than a century. Trump was elected with a clear mandate to curtail immigration, especially immigration disadvantageous to the U.S. taxpayer. But a series of judges have decided to take immigration policy into their own hands. 

Similar injunctions are often overturned, but the administration has to battle these injunctions in the courts. In September, the Supreme Court issued a ruling that ended injunctions on the administration’s rule change regarding asylum seekers. Under that new rule, asylum seekers must claim asylum in one of the first countries they enter. 

Advertisement

Earlier this year, the Supreme Court sided with the administration that criminal immigrants can be detained in the United States anytime while awaiting deportation. And in 2018, the Supreme Court upheld the president’s travel ban, barring entry into the United States from seven specific countries.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement