Supreme Court Just Delivered Devastating News for Dems in Their Redistricting Fight
Texas Supreme Court Ends Abbott's Push to Expel Lawmakers Who Fled the State...
Texas to House the Nation's First Detransitioner Clinic
The AP Wants to Ban Guns Not Being Used; NBC News Frets a...
In the UK, Offensive Words Are Now an Offense Punishable by Death
Wait Until California Taxpayers Hear About yet Another Newsom Spending Debacle
Senator Bernie Moreno Sounds the Alarm on Chinese Vehicles Entering the US
Venezuela Opposition Leader Refuses to Take the Bait As CNN Presses Her on...
The UAE Has a Plan to Circumvent Iran and the Strait of Hormuz...
Abortion by Mail Must Stop
Iraqi Terror Commander Arrested for Plotting Nearly 20 Attacks in U.S. and Europe
Lottery Scammer Pushed 73-Year-Old to Sell Her Home for a Prize That Never...
Virginia's New Gun Ban Faces Immediate Legal Challenge From Second Amendment Groups
Former Labor Dept. Employee Pleads Guilty to Stealing $46K in Pandemic Unemployment Funds
Michigan Nurse Convicted in $1.6M Medicare Fraud Scheme Using Stolen Patient Records
Tipsheet

Another Judge Blocks Trump Immigration Policy

Another Judge Blocks Trump Immigration Policy
AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta

An unelected federal Judge from New York has decided the Trump administration's new "public charge" rule won’t go into effect on Tuesday, Oct. 15th, as previously scheduled. The Hill is reporting that George Daniels, a U.S. District Court Judge in Manhattan, issued a preliminary injunction blocking the rule change from taking effect nationwide.

Advertisement

In August, the Trump administration announced a new “public charge” rule for immigrants seeking to enter the country or obtain a green card. Under the new rule, applicants who have received public-assistance benefits for a 12-month period within the last three years will be denied. Many immigrants take advantage of government-assistance programs like food stamps, housing vouchers, and Medicaid.

Despite the hysteria, public charge rules have been on the books for more than a century. Trump was elected with a clear mandate to curtail immigration, especially immigration disadvantageous to the U.S. taxpayer. But a series of judges have decided to take immigration policy into their own hands. 

Similar injunctions are often overturned, but the administration has to battle these injunctions in the courts. In September, the Supreme Court issued a ruling that ended injunctions on the administration’s rule change regarding asylum seekers. Under that new rule, asylum seekers must claim asylum in one of the first countries they enter. 

Advertisement

Earlier this year, the Supreme Court sided with the administration that criminal immigrants can be detained in the United States anytime while awaiting deportation. And in 2018, the Supreme Court upheld the president’s travel ban, barring entry into the United States from seven specific countries.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement