Joe Scarborough Really Stretched the Limits of Sanity With This Take on the...
Fiasco: NYC GOP Councilwoman Just Obliterated Mamdani Over the City's Shambolic Winter Sto...
US Attorney Asks Judge to Dismiss Indictment Against Steve Bannon
Jasmine Crockett Shows Just How Low Democrats Are Willing to Go to Attack...
A Boy Has Stolen Another Girls' Championship Title
Dozens of Detransitioners Have Filed Lawsuits, and the Costs Could End 'Gender-Affirming C...
While Homeless New Yorkers Freeze, the NYT Wants Us to Know This About...
Sen. Warren Repeats Debunked Lie About Women and the SAVE Act
We Must Not Submit to 'Diversity'
A Maryland Squatter Walks Free — and Here's What Her Attorney Had...
AWFUL Who Harassed Yoga Studio Employees Over ICE Earned Herself a Ban
Deadline Tries to Guilt Trip John Lithgow for Starring in HBO's 'Harry Potter'...
Mayor Mamdani Becomes First NYC Leader to Skip Archbishop Installation in Almost a...
Trump Targets Obama’s Climate 'Endangerment Finding' in Sweeping Rollback of Emissions Rul...
Steve Hilton Isn’t Even Governor Yet, and He’s Already Exposing California Welfare Fraud
Tipsheet

Challenge to Pro-life Texas Law Gives Supreme Court its First Abortion Case in 8 Years

House Bill 2 has been a favorite target of pro-abortion supporters because its strict standards have shuttered about half of the abortion clinics in Texas. The legislation has withstood the attacks thus far, yet it now faces its biggest challenge yet. The Supreme Court has agreed to hear arguments over the law's specifics in Whole Woman’s Health v. Cole, accepting its first abortion case since 2007. 

Advertisement

Up for debate are two provisions: one that asks abortion clinics to operate as surgical centers and another that requires abortionists to obtain admitting privileges at a local hospital. Critics say these regulations are unfair to Texas women and their reproductive rights.

In the case, the justices will determine whether a two-year-old law in Texas poses an “undue burden” on women’s legal right to terminate a pregnancy. That standard was set during the landmark 1992 ruling on Planned Parenthood v. Casey, and abortion opponents are hoping to change nearly 25 years of precedent.

You may remember State Senator Wendy Davis' 11-hour filibuster against the pro-life bill in the summer of 2013, which inspired thousands of pro-abortion protesters to storm Austin's Capitol building. Their demands, however, went nowhere. The legislation passed, Gov. Rick Perry signed it into law and it has since saved thousands of unborn babies. 

Advertisement

Related:

TEXAS

Nevertheless, that doesn't mean its opponents have given up. With the green light from the judiciary, they see new hope to tear down the pro-life bill.

The Court will decide this case next June, just a few months before the 2016 presidential election.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos