Michael Medved: Over-Heated Gun Rhetoric Works Against Reform
Below is your personal RSS feed link, generated just for you - please do not share it!
https://townhall.com/podcastfeed/vip/townhallreview?m=
You can get your link from the Podcast show page, which you can paste into the listening app of your choice. For most apps, you can do this by clicking "Add a show by URL" or "Add by RSS feed". You can find app-specific instructions below.
Apple Podcasts
- Open your Library
- Tap or click Add a show by URL
- Paste the link above
Google Podcasts
- Tap or click Activity on the bottom right of your screen
- Scroll to Subscriptions on the top and then tap the 3-dot menu
- Tap or click Add by RSS feed
- Paste the link above
If pro-life conservatives ever claimed that supporters of Planned Parenthood had “blood on their hands”, the mainstream media would howl in protest.
Why, then, do anti-gun activists who make precisely such claims about supporters of the NRA draw widespread acclaim for their courage and idealism?
The connection between abortion and killing is obvious—even if you deny that the procedure is equivalent to murder. But there’s no connection between backing gun-rights and endorsing killing. Disagreement over specific policy proposals doesn’t mean that those on the other side want to consign our children to early death or to obliterate our Constitutional rights.
Republican leaders in Washington have already moved ahead with common sense enhancements in our gun regulations but hysterical, polarizing rhetoric only makes constructive reform less likely.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
