Kristi Noem Has a New Explanation for Why She Shot Her Dog
Can the Current Universities Be Saved?
A ‘Morning Joe’ Exclusive Column: It Was One Long, Problematic Morning Indeed at...
Joe Biden, Dearborn Shahid, Commits Political Suicide via Hamas Appeasement
The Public Doesn't Trust the 'Democracy-Saving' Media
Taxpayers Are Subsidizing College Extremism
Radical Leftists Claim Oil Companies Are Committing Climate Murder
Inflation Reduction Act's Dirty Little Secret: Largest Premium Increase Ever for Medicare...
Biden Administration Continues to Misdiagnose and Mistreat the Violent Crime Problem
A Lack of Imagination
Democrat Unity on Border Crisis Showing Signs of Cracking
Did the House of Representatives Just Outlaw Quoting Parts of the New Testament?
Blinken, the Terminator
RFK Jr. Offers Odd Pledge to Joe Biden in Attempt to Get Him...
Wait Until You Hear What Iran Is Offering Expelled US College Students
OPINION

Bridging the no-new-taxes divide

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Democrats insist that any debt deal must include new revenues. Republicans say no way.

The differences seem irreconcilable, the hopes for a deal all but dead.

Advertisement

But they’re not.

Politicians can always finesse the way they inject new money into the government bloodstream — and what they call it.

A short list of revenue ideas, floated for weeks among congressional leaders and the White House, points to some wiggle room behind the black-and-white positions — and therefore, more leeway for a deal than the rhetoric suggests.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0711/58944.html#ixzz1S5d5ByCN

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos