Another Boeing Whistleblower Has Died
Why Everyone Thinks Biden Had an Accident in Front of the Press Corps
Don Lemon: The DEI Stuff Has Gone Off the Rails
The (Communist) Nerds Are the Bad Guys in This Movie
Biden's Advisers Push to Doing Something We All Knew Was Coming
Trump Campaign Thrashes Biden for Botched Response to Pro-Hamas Unrest
My Favorite Story of the Year (So Far)
Don't Obstruct the Leftist Implosion
No Satisfaction With Stone Age Celebrities Jagger and De Niro
Guess Who's Funding the Pro-Hamas Hate Rallies and Encampments?
University Trash Heaps
Why Do Leftists Hate Israel? (It’s Not What You Think)
The Corruption of Rep. Adam Schiff Is Reaching a Tipping Point
Cringy Mark Hamill PC Shows Need for White House Reform
Expiring Tax Provisions Could Cost Thirty Million American Taxpayers New Accounting Fees
OPINION

Candidates Show G.O.P. Less United on Goals of War

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

DERRY, N.H. — The hawkish consensus on national security that has dominated Republican foreign policy for the last decade is giving way to a more nuanced view, with some presidential candidates expressing a desire to withdraw from Afghanistan as quickly as possible and suggesting that the United States has overreached in Libya.

Advertisement

The shift, while incremental so far, appears to mark a separation from a post-Sept. 11 posture in which Republicans were largely united in supporting an aggressive use of American power around the world. A new debate over the costs and benefits of deploying the military reflects the length of the conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq, the difficulty of building functional governments and the financial burden at home in a time of extreme fiscal pressure.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos