Be Armed and Ready – the Asymmetrical Battlefield Could Be Here at Home
Women’s Sports Just Aren’t As Entertaining As Men’s Are
This Iranian-American Dem Just Shamed Her Party About the Airstrikes and Trump on...
Pete Hegseth, Vindicated (Part Deux)
Punctuated Living
The New American Century
The Law
The Left Is Petrified That Trump Will Succeed in Iran and Expose Them...
'Hanoi' Jane Typifies Hollywood Idiocy
FDA Cruelly Holding Up Approval of Treatments for Rare Diseases, Despite Children Likely...
10 Reported Dead After Pakistanis Attempt to Storm U.S. Embassy
Trump Calls on Iranian Military to Lay Down Arms or Face Certain Death
Thomas Massie Joins in With Democrat Allies Who Claim That Iran Strikes Are...
Miami Man Gets 4.5 Years in Prison for Possessing 450 Stolen or Counterfeit...
Illegal Immigrant Sentenced to 19 Years Over Alleged $4M Romance, Business Scams
OPINION

Candidates Show G.O.P. Less United on Goals of War

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Candidates Show G.O.P. Less United on Goals of War

DERRY, N.H. — The hawkish consensus on national security that has dominated Republican foreign policy for the last decade is giving way to a more nuanced view, with some presidential candidates expressing a desire to withdraw from Afghanistan as quickly as possible and suggesting that the United States has overreached in Libya.

Advertisement

The shift, while incremental so far, appears to mark a separation from a post-Sept. 11 posture in which Republicans were largely united in supporting an aggressive use of American power around the world. A new debate over the costs and benefits of deploying the military reflects the length of the conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq, the difficulty of building functional governments and the financial burden at home in a time of extreme fiscal pressure.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement