Hollywood's Other Problem Has Nothing to Do With Political Correctness
Top Insane Moments of House Dems Speaking Out Against Parental Rights in Education...
Confronting DeSantis at Barnes & Noble
Trump Warns of 'Potential Death & Destruction' If He's Charged
These Schools Removed Cops to Appease BLM—It Didn't End Well
Greta Thunberg Sees a Great Capitalist Conspiracy Against the Climate
Xi and Vlad, a Wake-Up Call for America and the West
Bullies Rule Under Woke Discipline Policies
Europe Extends Sanctions Against Iran
The P-8 Poseidon Is Increasingly Important for the Defense of Our Nation
Suspicious Package Containing White Powder and a Threatening Note Arrives at Bragg's Offic...
Democrats and Republicans Plan Visit to Prison Where Jan. 6 Defendants Are Being...
Republicans Call DeSantis's Attacks Against Trump 'Childish' and 'Cute'
Iranian Rocket Attacks Injure More U.S. Service Members
New Poll Shows Gen Z, Millennial Voters’ Thoughts on Banning TikTok

I Say We Are Doing Our Job

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.

Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution is clear. A president may nominate judges to the Supreme Court, but the power to grant or withhold consent rests exclusively with the U.S. Senate.

Nowhere does it say that the Senate must hold hearings or votes on these nominees. Senators of both parties have acknowledged and supported this position for years.

In 2005, Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., declared, “Nowhere in that document (the Constitution) does it say the Senate has a duty to give presidential nominees a vote.”

Vice President Joe Biden, former chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, made a similar argument in 1992. Biden said that “once the political season is underway, and it is, action on a Supreme Court nomination must be put off until after the election campaign is over. That is what is fair to the nominee and essential to the process.”

Both Reid and Biden were right then. Senate Republicans are right now. Despite Democrats previously making the same argument, they now say Republicans are not doing their job. I say we are doing our job.

What’s at stake here is the integrity of the advice-and-consent process, not a particular nominee. It’s the principle, not the individual.

The Democrats’ hypocrisy and political posturing is a perfect example of why Americans are fed up with Washington politicians and why Supreme Court confirmation hearings should not be held against the backdrop of a presidential election.

That is not a partisan viewpoint. The last time a Supreme Court vacancy arose in a presidential election year, and a nominee was confirmed in that same year, was 1932. Not since 1888 was a Supreme Court justice nominated and confirmed by a divided government in a presidential election year.

The upcoming presidential election will not only determine the direction of our country, but also serve as a referendum on the balance of the Supreme Court for generations.

The American people deserve a voice in this process.

Sen. David Perdue, R-Ga., the only Fortune 500 CEO in Congress, serves on the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member


Trending on Townhall Video