Joe's Dubious Oil Slick

"Don't they know it's the end of the world..." (Skeeter Davis, 1962)

President Biden has repeated a story he has told before, but repetition does not necessarily make it true.

Speaking last week in Somerset, Massachusetts, where a coal-fired power plant once stood, Biden again recalled growing up in Claymont, Delaware, where he said pollution was so bad "You had to put on your windshield wipers to get, literally, the oil slick off the window."

The Wilmington News Journal has records dating back to 1923. They contain no stories I could find about oil slicks on car windshields in Delaware. I emailed the Journal and a reply came from Phil Freedman, regional editor for investigations and enterprise: "Dust and ash and other debris used to more regularly fall on cars and other horizontal surfaces there when those operations were running at full capacity. Biden has used this anecdote about the oil on the windshields before. I and a reporter who has covered him extensively, recall. But we cannot find the actual clips nor did we ever confirm it. It was just one of a bunch of stories he told."

Biden's hyperbole when it comes to end-of-the-world prophecies follows many similar predictions that failed to materialize. According to the American Enterprise Institute (AEI), a center-right Washington, D.C.-based think tank that researches government, politics, economics, and social welfare, none of the climate change prophecies made by climate alarmists over the last 50-plus years have come true, not even close.

View the rest at https://www.aei.org/carpe-diem/50-years-of-failed-doomsday-eco-pocalyptic-predictions-the-so-called-experts-are-0-50/. These do not include more recent and contradictory statements by climate czar John Kerry and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY), among others in politics and the media, who have variously said we have only weeks, months, or a few years to stymie Earth's extinction.

Bjorn Lomborg, a Danish author and president of the think tank Copenhagen Consensus Center, takes a pragmatic approach to changing weather patterns. In his book "False Alarm: How Climate Change Panic Costs Us Trillions, Hurts the Poor, and Fails to Fix the Planet," Lomborg, a visiting professor at Copenhagen Business School and visiting fellow at Stanford University's Hoover Institution, though not a climate scientist, says while he believes the planet is slowly warming, "The science shows us that fears of a climate apocalypse are unfounded" and that politics, not science, is behind this worldview. "Many climate campaigners go further than the science supports," he writes. Greta Thunberg, are you paying attention?

Lomborg says the way forward is to "evaluate climate policy in the same way we evaluate other policy: in terms of costs and benefits." He argues that if current hyperbolic policies are implemented the costs will be huge, the benefits few and they will crush the middle class and especially the poor.

The book is worth reading if for no other reason than it is a moderate voice that lowers the temperature created by the climate alarmists. Lowering the rhetorical temperature in our politics and among scientists would be helpful, since history has shown predictions are often more wrong than right on this and other subjects. These include contradictory statements about COVID-19 and now monkeypox, which the World Health Organization has just declared a "global health emergency."

Haven't we heard that before?

Joe's Dubious Oil Slick

Recommended