YouTuber Ms Rachel Just Cut a Campaign Check. Take a Wild Guess of...
Dems Know They Probably Should've Kept This Poll Private, Right?
Disbarred for Defending Trump: ACLJ Takes the Fight to the Supreme Court
New York Times Puts Brutal Dictator on Its Fashion List, Then Quietly Deletes...
Skynet Panic or Power Grab? Bipartisan Bill Would Let Government Shut Down AI...
Appeals Court Rejects Trump Administration's Efforts to Re-Detain Researcher Over Israel C...
USA Today Gets Tripped by Its Caitlin Clark Opposition. AP Weeps We No...
Thought Crimes Come to Minnesota
Long Island Residents Object to All-Boys Muslim Boarding School in Their Neighborhood
Freddy, Everyone's Favorite German Tourist, Bids America Farewell
Forcing Assisted Suicide Is Unconstitutional
Florida Financier Sentenced to 20 Years for Laundering Funds Tied to Haitian Assassination
Two Georgia Men Plead Guilty in $550,000 New York Film Tax Credit Scam
NM Woman Pleads Guilty in $3.9 Million Medicaid Transportation Fraud Scheme
Trump Demands Key 'Reconciliation 3.0' Step Passed Before August Recess
OPINION

What Are They Smoking in Colorado?

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
What Are They Smoking in Colorado?

Well, pot sales in Colorado have been doing so well that the governor has announced his plans to put some of the unexpected tax revenues towards substance abuse prevention and youth marijuana use prevention. What in the world is he smoking?

Advertisement

This would be similar to announcing that cigarette prices will be dropped dramatically in order to increase sales so that additional funds can be generated for the study of lung cancer.

Or that MacDonald’s has been encouraged by the government to introduce extra-fatty, triple-super-sized meals with the caveat that they donate part of the profits to obesity prevention.

Or that drunk driving laws will be relaxed so that more traffic tickets can be given out with the increased revenue used to educate the public on the dangers of driving while intoxicated.

Are these analogies any crazier than what Colorado Governor John Hickenlooper has proposed?

As reported by AP News, “The spending plan included $45.5 million for youth use prevention, $40.4 million for substance abuse treatment and $12.4 million for public health.”

In his letter to legislative budget writers, Gov. Hickenlooper wrote, “We view our top priority as creating an environment where negative impacts on children from marijuana legalization are avoided completely.”

What? You legalize recreational marijuana use in your state, sales of the drug then skyrocket, and your “top priority” is to create an environment “where negative impacts on children from marijuana legalization are avoided completely”?

Does the governor really think that with the new, easier access to marijuana, coupled with the removal of the “illegal” taboo, that kids won’t have more access to the drug? Does he really think that as more parents are getting high more freely that the kids under their care won’t be negatively impacted?

Advertisement

Related:

COLORADO

The only way to completely avoid negative impacts on children is to do the opposite of what Colorado has done, and even then, the negative impact on kids couldn’t be completely avoided.

Instead, Gov. Hickenlooper and his state have turned on the sprinkler system and are now trying to keep the kids dry. This is nothing less than moral and legislative insanity.

According to the report, “The governor also proposed a $5.8 million, three-year ‘statewide media campaign on marijuana use,’ presumably highlighting the drug's health risks.”

What? You make the drug legal, even though it has been the gateway drug for harder drug use for decades, your state celebrates this newfound liberty in very public ways, and you use tax revenue from marijuana sales to fund a “statewide media campaign on marijuana use”?

Last November, a report from Seattle noted that, “More drivers have been testing positive for marijuana since Washington legalized the drug last year, according to new figures from the State Patrol.

“In the first six months of 2013, the patrol’s crime lab says, 745 people tested positive for marijuana. Typically, there are about 1,000 positive pot tests on drivers in a full year.”

And while there are different explanations for these numbers, even Kevin Sabet, of Project SAM (Smart Approaches to Marijuana), said that, “It’s certainly cause for alarm. It’s very possible people are getting the message that this is OK. Obviously, impaired driving is a major public safety issue.”

Advertisement

Not to worry. Gov. Hickenlooper and his team have this covered too. According to his proposal, “The state Department of Transportation would get $1.9 million for a new ‘Drive High, Get a DUI’ campaign to tout the state's new marijuana blood-limit standard for drivers.”

That should do it.

In fact, I have a proposal for Mr. Hickenlooper and the people of Colorado. Why stop with marijuana? After all, both hard liquor and beer are legal, so why not follow suit with drugs?

Just think of all the funds that could be generated if cocaine and Ecstasy and heroin and a host of other drugs were legalized. The profits would be mindboggling, and with the new tax revenues, just think of all the drug prevention programs that could be funded.

Which leads me back to my question: What are they smoking in Colorado?

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement