So, That's How the Jake Sullivan Intruder Snuck By the Secret Service
If Joe’s a No-Go, Then Who?
Why Does Our Misery Surprise Us?
The Mainstream Media Threatens American Democracy
Millennials Are Starting to Shift to the Right
Conservatives Are Winning In the Boycott Against Woke Companies
18 States Sue Biden As Illegal Aliens Enter the U.S., Reaping the Benefits...
Biden Signs Debt Ceiling Bill, Avoids Default By Two Days
DeSantis Responds to Heckler In Best Way Possible
Biden Lies Several Times While 'Celebrating' a 'Crisis Averted' Situation In Debt Ceiling...
Some Transgender People Are Crowdfunding to Leave the State of Florida
Brace for Impact: DOE Is About to Unleash Sexual Assault on Girls and...
Pride Month and Why Schools Are Sexualizing Children
Abortion and the Question of a Higher Law
A Bad Start For Pride Month
OPINION

Is a Do-Nothing Congress Worth Steroid Hearings?

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.

For every conservative who is irritated that illegal immigration has never really been addressed...

For every liberal who can't understand why the big oil companies and their unbelievable profits haven't been reigned in, or forced to accelerate development of new refineries or energy alternatives...

For every family wondering how their house ended up being worth less than the cost of the amount of money they had to borrow to purchase it...

For every American, there should be one raging question today...

No, it's not whether baseball star Roger Clemens had HGH shot into his rear end, or if his former trainer is lying. Instead, the question should be, "What possible use do we have for a blowhard Congress that ducks every critical issue that impacts all our economic and personal well-being in favor of putting on silly shows designed to create television ratings for its own members?"

I know, I know: We don't want kids copying their heroes by using steroids.

We also don't want them copying a lot of other things that the famous and the not-so-famous are doing in their lives.

But is this really the only useful thing that Congress can take authoritative action on?

The chickens on Capitol Hill ran away from fixing the immigration issue last year because it became too hot of a political potato. They gave the FairTax short shrift, never really delving into a policy change that could potentially save us from our antiquated and unfair tax system.

When the roof fell in from a housing boom that we all knew would go bust and trigger an anemic economy, Congress's answer was not to fix the system, but to hand out $600 stipends to Americans that will come -- here's the real shocker -- close to election time. Then their effect will disappear from the economy in the blink of an eye.

The last political leader to offer pure political bribery of the public was presidential candidate George McGovern in 1972, when he proposed giving every American $1,000. He was laughed into political oblivion. Now the solution for which he was labeled a liberal nut is the policy of a Republican president and a Democratic Congress. Go figure.

At least McGovern's amount, based on the value of $1,000 in 1972, amounted to a tangible sum that could have turned some families' financial problems around. But it was labeled a government "handout" and a quick fix. Today, this paltry stimulus package that Bush and the Congress put together amounts to the same thing.

If anyone wonders why voters are crawling out of the woodwork this year to vote in the presidential primaries, they need look no further than Washington, D.C. This "Beltway Bubble" simply doesn't get it. I read their esoteric writings on public policy. It's all hogwash because none of it will ever translate into action. I hear the elected officials shucking and jiving as they try to run the clock out on this year's Congressional calendar.

Congress was among the last to recognize the housing disaster, to see the economy flattening out, and to recognize that Iraq might not be the dominant issue in the political campaign.

And why? Because they all live in Washington, D.C., and the only people they talk to are one another. Only when they find a policy they can comfortably confront, like steroids in baseball, do they spring into action. (Then there's the case of Sen. Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania. He apparently feels the compelling issue of the day is whether some NFL teams are spying on other NFL teams.) Please give us a break.

We waste money like there's no tomorrow. We tax people until they are blue in the face. Our big cities have homeless people roaming the downtown streets at night. Our kids still have a competitive disadvantage against the rest of the world when it comes to education. We have a serious drought that threatens an entire section of the country. Our air-traffic control system is becoming dangerously archaic. And that's just for starters.

But instead, we have a government, Democratic and Republican, that's hell-bent on eradicating the world of steroids. An admirable cause were it not the equivalent of catching a snowflake in a blizzard.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Video