This Dem Senator's Post About Tulsi Gabbard Resigning Was Absolutely Classless
Look Who Introduced President Trump at a Rally Yesterday. And Some Libs Were...
The Media Lamentations and Press Bereavement Over the Demise of Stephen Colbert Thankfully...
Paige Cognetti Has a History of Harming Scranton Families, and She'd Do the...
Rep. Hageman Channels the Wyoming Way on Energy, Natural Resources Issues
Why I Will Always Stand With Law Enforcement
Student Activists Are a Symptom — Classroom Bias Is the Disease
States Are Not Bystanders in Homeland Defense
Equal Protection Means What It Says
Has Blaine Luetkemeyer Slayed the Corporate DEI Dragons?
Piers Morgan, Ben Gvir, and the Gift Nobody Asked for
Kansas Mom Says School Let Sex Offender Chaperone Field Trip
Man Allegedly Bilked Taxpayers for 20 Years Out of $283k by Stealing Dead...
Memorial Day Weekend Could Mark Next Chapter in U.S.-Iran Conflict
Man Accused of Michigan Shooting Was Previously Convicted of Hog-Tying Woman but Was...
OPINION

John Bolton Is Far From a Whistleblower

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
 John Bolton Is Far From a Whistleblower
AP Photo/Patrick Semansky

Former National Security Advisor John Bolton may be many things — but he is certainly not a whistleblower.

Although Democrats and the liberal media are portraying Bolton’s recent memoir as a so-called “bombshell,” his book is nothing but a political smear job from start to finish. Bolton’s purposeful comingling of highly-classified information with salacious opinions is hardly historic or brave — it’s sad and dangerous.

Advertisement

Listen, I know a thing or two about exposing shadow operations in the federal government. I also know the importance of building a bulletproof case against government agencies that are abusing their power. There is no room for error, particularly when it comes to describing information that may jeopardize U.S. national security. Whistleblowers have a responsibility to be truthful about their claims, and to ensure that their work serves the greater good. To do anything less is to enable the very behavior one is trying to expose.

When I wrote Operation Dark Heart, nearly 10 years had passed since the event documented in the book, and I made sure every name, event, and document that appeared in the book was properly researched and vetted. I went out of my way to find corroborating witnesses who could support my claims, who then participated in writing the book, and took the precautions that were necessary to ensure the safety of active intelligence operatives. My goal: to provide the public an understanding of corruption and to seek accountability. My publisher also cooperated fully with the proper authorities, and complied with the government’s requests to revise parts of the book.

Sadly, the same cannot be said about Bolton, whose book is a cocktail of uncorroborated claims about current national security matters, with highly-classified talking points sprinkled in to entice people to buy it. To make matters worse, Bolton is clearly driven by an ego fed by minimal professional competence and a thirst for revenge, and is abusing the “position of personal trust and responsibility” he was provided to serve the American people and hijacked it to advance his personal political interests. 

Advertisement

“This is unprecedented,” Attorney General William Barr explained in a recent press conference. “I don’t know if any book that’s been published so quickly while … the office holders are still in government and it’s about very current events and current leaders and current discussions and current policy issues,” Barr continued, stressing that much of the information referenced in the memoir remains “inherently classified.”

The attorney general is completely right — but the issues with Bolton’s book don’t stop there. The former national security advisor also apparently did not complete the clearance process prior to publishing his book, despite being legally obligated to do so.

Because Bolton did not follow government guidelines or obtain written approval to publish, and because his book will likely contain at least some classified information, he will likely lose in court and ultimately all profits and proceeds of the book will go to the government.

“People who come to work in the government and have access to sensitive information generally sign an agreement [consenting to a] clearance process before they can publish the book,” Barr explained, adding that authorities “don’t believe that Bolton went through that process — hasn’t completed the process — and therefore is in violation of that agreement.”

That being said, I do not fault Donald Trump for giving Bolton an opportunity to prove himself in the White House. The president has put his faith in numerous individuals who have asked for a second chance to serve their country — and most have served far more patriotically and capably than Bolton. Regrettably, Bolton lived up to his reputation as a self-serving conniver, and he was rightly dismissed from the administration. 

Advertisement

No matter what the Democrats and the mainstream media say about Bolton, he is not a true whistleblower. His reckless memoir is a desperate publicity stunt by a disgruntled career politician, but it’s one that could nonetheless have costly ramifications for our national security. 

Lt. Col. Tony Shaffer is a retired senior intelligence operations officer and President of the London Center for Policy Research.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement