Stop Telling People to Only Vote on Election Day
The President Who Wasn’t There
Speaker Mike Johnson: Israel’s Only Dependable Ally in Washington
Iran and Israel: The Nicest Thing We Can Do Is Obliterate Leftism
The World Needs Peacemaker Trump Again
Big Tech Is Manipulating Us Even More Now, Despite the Pushback
America’s Moral Authority Is at Stake in Gaza
Actions Biden Should but Will Never Take to Neutralize Iran
What Happened Over the Skies of Israel Was Extraordinary
Biden Selling Out Your Healthcare to Global Bureaucrats
Arsonists in the White House
A Tax Day Reminder That the Government Is Wasting Your Money
The Two Faces of Joe Biden—Senile Old Fool or Political Genius?
How Will Israel Retaliate Against Iran?
A Secure Border Protects Women

I’m Not a Criminal. Why Should I Care About Criminal Justice Reform?

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of

Criminal justice reform has been a hot topic lately. It’s something that both Republicans and Democrats can find common ground on. However, I get the sense that many Americans aren’t convinced that it would benefit them personally. 


Most of us are probably law-obeying citizens whom would never dream of being involved in illicit activities. We don’t have regular run-ins with the police. We don’t sell or use illegal drugs. We’re just normal people trying to do what’s right and take care of our families. 

So, why should non-criminals care about criminal justice reform?

First, eliminating or reducing mandatory minimum sentences would benefit everyone.

By law, people convicted of certain crimes must spend a minimum number of years in prison. The problem with this approach is that it takes away discretion from judges and punishes different offenders the same.

To their chagrin, judges cannot reduce someone’s sentence if they think it’s unfair based on individual circumstances. There are many examples of people with no prior convictions being sentenced to 5, 10, or 20 mandatory years in prison for non-violent petty crimes.

Mandatory minimums are a big reason why the prison population has exploded over the past few decades. The number of drug-offenders in prison has increased 21 times since mandatory minimums went into effect in 1980. Nearly half of all federal prisoners are serving time for drugs.

There are several reasons why you should care about the overpopulated prison population. Keep in mind that you’re paying for their stay with your taxes. Fiscal conservatives should think twice before supporting taxpayers subsidizing all the costs of imprisoned drug users.

Due to overcrowded jails, some violent offenders (think: rapists and child molesters) are being released early to make room for non-violent drug offenders required to serve a set amount of years.


The Smarter Sentencing Act would reduce federal mandatory minimum sentences for non-violent drug offenders: from 20-10-5 to 10-5-2, respectively. The Department of Justice finds that it would save taxpayers $23.9 billion over the next 20 years.

It’s a step in the right direction.

Secondly, civil asset forfeiture reform would benefit everyone.

Civil asset forfeiture has allowed police departments to seize private property from people suspected of a crime and sell it for a profit. Someone does not necessarily need to be convicted or even arrested to get their property taken away from them.

It could affect you someday. There are instances of people getting their houses or cars taken away because someone else was accused of committing a crime in or on your property. So, be careful about who you let borrow your car.

Not all civil asset forfeiture cases have to do with drugs. Have you ever gambled with your friends? There are examples of SWAT Teams raiding otherwise peaceful high-stake poker games and seizing all the cash. In one instance, they stole $150,000.

This puts many police officers in an unwanted position too. Police officers will tell you that they don’t make the laws—they only enforce them. I’m sure most will privately say that they have better things to do than raid a home with ten men playing poker in the basement.

The FAIR (Fifth Amendment Integrity Restoration) Act would require the government to prove its case by producing clear and compelling evidence before assets may be considered “forfeited.”


It’s an improvement.

Lastly, allowing adults an opportunity to seal non-violent criminal records will benefit everyone.

Many of us have made mistakes in our youth. All of our recent presidents have tried pot. Polls show that nearly half of Americans admit they have too. (It’s safe to assume that some people were not entirely honest to pollsters.)

Some of us got lucky and didn’t get caught. But others have their youthful mistakes follow them around for a lifetime. Many ex-offenders have trouble finding employment. This sometimes leads to them towards a life of crime, or being dependent on taxpayer-funded welfare.

The REDEEM Act would create a path for people who have demonstrated the will to be rehabilitated, to expunge their records of non-violent offenses so that they are able to become productive members of society.

Criminal justice reform will benefit everyone from overtaxed law-obeying citizens to ex-offenders seeking redemption. It’s an issue that has transcended party lines, and the time to fix America’s broken criminal justice system is now.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member


Trending on Townhall Videos