Israel's Mossad Account Posted Something Interesting About Iran's New Leader
Stelter Hung Out to Dry a Second Time This week – Says Network...
Progressive Crackpots Vs. Environmental Wackos
The Morality of Taxation
Healthcare Is Not a Right, Nor Should the Government Guarantee It
The Road to Tehran Runs Through Baku
The Parent-Led Rebellion Against EdTech
It’s Time to Build America With U.S.-Made Materials
DEI Is Dead. Corporate America Just Hasn’t Admitted It Yet.
Affordability Is Not a Slogan. Democrats Treat It Like One.
From Panic to Therapy: Cycle of Faux Climate Fear
President Donald J. Trump Can Index Capital Gains With Pen
The Unbearable Lightness of Being Gavin Newsom
The First Time in My Life That I Have Come Into Conflict With...
Temple Israel Terrorist Died of Self-Inflicted Wound, Stuffed Truck With Accelerant and Fi...
OPINION

Should Fat People Pay More For Insurance?

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Should Fat People Pay More For Insurance?

In our long road trip to my grandfather’s memorial service, we had a conversation I would like to invite you to be a part of. It’s clear that America has an obesity problem. How do we solve it?

Advertisement

Education isn’t working. Will power of people just isn’t strong enough and almost weekly it seems like we get new information on something. One week it’s the Mediterranean diet, the next Paleo and so on.

My opinion is that changing economic incentives will change outcomes. Governments have responded by taxing sugary drinks, candy, and fast food. However, just eating at a regular run of the mill restaurant can be worse calorie wise than fast food.

I think it runs deeper. Here is what I would do. I would set up a standard height/weight/age range with targets for cholesterol and blood sugars. I mean, it’s sort of like the old adage, “if it looks like a duck….”.

What do you think about setting a regulation that private companies and government agencies only had to pay for health insurance for standardized people. Any costs above and beyond that fell upon the person to pay. That’s using sticks to try to change behavior.

Conversely, you could set the same standard. Instead of a stick, a carrot. If you are below or meet the standard, you get a cash benefit. A discount on insurance or a rebate from your company in the form of a cash payment.

Which do you think would work better to try and solve America’s obesity problem? Bear in mind, everything we have done so far hasn’t worked.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement