Remember Kilmar Abrego Garcia? Well...
So, About That Venezuelan Oil Tanker...
Trump Rages Against This Stupid Tradition Democrats Are Using to Block His Appointments
GOP Senator Levels Leftist Hack for Making Light of Child Suicide
Jasmine Crockett Says She Didn't Claim Latino Trump Supporters Have a 'Slave Mentality.'...
Tim Walz Is Lying About ICE Arresting American Citizens
Turns Out There's a Massive Loophole in Minnesota's Paid Leave Program
Insurrection: Anti-ICE Protesters Disrupt House Homeland Security Committee Hearing
Choke Point 2.0: How the Biden Administration Targeted Digital Assets for Debanking
Meet Sarah Stalker, the Kentucky Democrat Who Wants Your Kids to Feel Bad...
Guess What Song Joy Reid Thinks Is Racist Now
Ban What: Social Media? Or Lazy Parents?
Democrat Lawmaker Calls the Terror Attack on National Guardsmen in DC an 'Unfortunate...
Democrat Senator Lashes Out As Others in His Party Inch Toward Sanity on...
Rachel Maddow Says Kamala Harris Saves Her Competence for Off the Record
OPINION

Do The Rich Pay More Taxes?

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.

The short answer is sure they do. They have more income so they pay more taxes. Statistically, the upper income earners pay almost 100% of the taxes to the federal government. The tax debate is so skewed with misinformation that it’s hard to make sense.

Advertisement

When it’s hard to make sense, it’s easier to drive home fallacious points about income gap’s, a smaller middle class, salary and wage discrepancies and the rest of the class warfare arguments you see popping up all over the media and in virtually every left wing political comment or speech.

The Wall Street Journal brought some sense to the debate with a look at Republican candidate Mitt Romney’s taxes. Romney, like Warren Buffett and other wealthy individuals that live off investment income pays a tax rate close to 15%. But when you look at the reality behind that tax rate, it’s closer to 50%. Why?

Because they are paid via dividends and interest on bonds they own. The companies that they are invested in pay a corporate rate of 35%. Wealthy investors that live off investments are paid after all the costs of running the business and taxes are taken out of the cash flow. They get the remains. In many cases, companies choose to buyback stock instead of pay a dividend. When that happens they get even less, and there is no guarantee that the stock will go up because of the buyback.

Instead of looking at who pays what, wouldn’t it be better to change the tax policy to incent everyone to do better? The job creation in America since Obama began driving the car has been abysmal. He likes to say the car was in the ditch when he took over control of the wheel. But, he hasn’t even had the presence of mind to call a wrecker to get us out of that ditch and on the road again. Instead he has taken it deeper into the ditch.

Advertisement

What we need going forward is a tax plan that doesn’t pick and choose winners and losers like the archaic one today. Currently there are deductions for this, alternative minimum taxes, add ons for that. What we should do is have a flat rate for both companies and individuals. 15%, no write offs. For individuals, that would mean take your income, subtract out FICA taxes you pay, multiply the net number by 15% and send it in.

That would be a far bigger stimulus to the economy than any government spending.

Remember too, all the time, money and energy that is paid to accountants to figure all this tax stuff out could be re-allocated to different uses. The human capital that is used to decipher the tax code could also be used differently. A flat tax with no write offs would have huge effects on our society believe it or not. The tax code influences your behavior.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement