Trans Day of Vengeance Has Been Cancelled
Q'Anon Shaman Has Been Released From Prison After Tucker Carlson Released the J6...
The George Soros Defense Strategy Implicates the Very People Using It
Learn the Lesson From Minnesota: Price Controls Don’t Work
One Year Later – the Murder of a Christian Arab Israeli Hero
Our Message To The Left: Here I Stand
So, What Are YOU Prepared To Do?
If We Want to Win the 21st Century Arms Race, We Can’t Afford...
Biden Nominees Undermining Confidence in the Courts
Million Dollar Pro-Trump Super PAC Attacks DeSantis Over Social Security and Medicare
Arizona Democrats Take Legal Action to Protect Biden's Re-Election
What Does Donald Trump's Indictment Mean for the 2024 Primary and Beyond?
Saudi Arabia Joins Forces With China: Why the U.S. Should Be Worried
John Fetterman Released From Hospital After Suffering From Severe Depression
MTG Calls For Protests In NYC Tuesday Ahead of Trump Arraignment

Obama's Latest Target: Unemployed Americans

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of

Last month, my fellow Chicagoan sent to Congress his latest misguided plan to bolster the U.S. economy. In his speech announcing the American Jobs Act, the president declared, without equivocation, that the bill was all or nothing.  “No games. No politics. No delays," he said, adding that he would veto any changes made by Republican lawmakers.

In his effort to perpetuate the myth that government creates jobs, Obama performed some deft slight-of-hand. For instance, he failed to mention the fact that his $450 billion jobs bill will be funded by the largest tax increase in history, coming to a W-2 near you in 2013. He also breezed over the parts of a Buy American provision that are more likely to disrupt manufacturers’ supply chains and anger trading partners than protect jobs.

Just when I thought the reckless resurgence of Taxulationism couldn’t get any worse, I learned of yet another reason that, when it comes to the jobs bill, Congress should opt for nothing instead of all. It turns out that Obama’s American Jobs act contains another hidden provision, one that would allow unsuccessful job applicants to sue if they think a company denied them a job because they were unemployed. 

You read that correctly. If you’re unemployed, go apply for a job. If you don’t get it, sue.

If that’s his idea of a carrot, I don’t want to see the stick.

There are 14 million people officially out of work in this country. Six million Americans are considered long-term unemployed. The average duration of joblessness is now 40 weeks, the highest in more than 60 years. These are our friends, our family members, our neighbors—the overwhelming majority of whom are capable and talented people.

And as a small businessman, I can’t interview a single one of them. The President of the United States has threatened me with litigation if I decide they’re not a good fit.

I own a few small companies, all of which have been getting by on skeleton crews for a while now. I’m not alone: layoff rates have dropped nationally, largely because there simply aren’t many more places we can make cuts. I absolutely want to hire—and I’m sure other business owners do too. But the socialist policy coming out of the Oval Office has made it impractical and borderline impossible.

Just for argument’s sake, though, let’s say that I did find a way to bring on one or two new people. I made it through the spider web of Dodd-Frank and digested the uncertainty of Obamacare and am ready to add some staff. Now I have to worry about being sued by any unsuccessful candidates for those positions? 

At a time when America needs jobs more than anything else, that is nothing short of absurd. In fact, it’s almost perverse.

Once again, my fellow Chicagoan has shown that when it comes to job creation, he doesn’t have a clue. And once again, he’s got his henchmen out on the front lines, doing his bidding. In this case, the gang of thugs is the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

The EEOC is an independent federal agency that enforces laws against workplace discrimination. It’s comprised of five members. Three are Obama appointees. The fourth, Stuart Ishimaru, was appointed by George W. Bush as part of a deal to appease Harry Reid and Tom Daschle and was later reappointed by Obama. The fifth and only true Bush appointee is Constance Barker. Her term ended July 1 of this year.

Sound familiar? That’s because it the NLRB story all over again. But this time, instead of going after a factory in South Carolina, Obama’s henchmen are attacking every small business across the nation—and, in turn, the nearly one in 10 Americans who are desperate to find work.

Later in his American Jobs Act speech, Obama held his nose and did his best to put a supply-side patina on what, just beneath the surface, was more of the same anti-business, anti-capitalist agenda he’s been pushing for the last two-and-a-half years.  "Instead of just talking about America's job creators, let's actually do something for America's job creators," he said.

I’ve got a suggestion for my fellow Chicagoan: How about you start by calling off your henchmen? All of them—the EEOC, the NLRB, the EPA. That might actually do something for America’s job creators.
Facebook / Twitter

Join the conversation as a VIP Member


Trending on Townhall Video