The AOC Parody Account Is Back From the Dead
House Freedom Caucus Gets Its Revenge for Debt Deal
Karine Jean-Pierre Ends White House Briefing After Question About Biden's Falls
Colorado Is Home to Probably the Most Unconstitutional Anti-Gun Push in Years
There Are New Details About the Plane Crash That Triggered a Military Response...
Trump Pollster Doesn't Have Great News for Trump
Video From FL's Migrant Flight to CA Pokes Holes in 'Kidnapping' Claims
Why One Democrat Says the Biden Admin Has Done a Good Job Preventing...
Shark Tank Star Explains How Target Saga Will Lead to a 'Complete Change'...
To Ronna, No Plan Is the Plan
Teachers Are Divided on Whether Arming Themselves Would Make Schools Safer: Poll
Human Rights Campaign Goes Even Further With Its New 'State of Emergency'
The Choice: Criminals Behind Bars or Laundry Detergent Behind Glass
MN School District Hosted ‘Gender Resource Fair’ Knowing It Would Cause Backlash, Document...
Annual LGBT Celebration at Disney World Helps Debunk 'Don't Say Gay' Lies About...

Americans, the Crucified

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of

When Pilate saw that he could prevail nothing, but that rather a tumult was made, he took water, and washed his hands before the multitude, saying, ‘I am innocent of the blood of this just person: see ye to it.’” (Matthew 27:24)

On August 9, the Federal Open Market Committee and its chairman, Ben Bernanke, released its bi-monthly statement. To promote economic growth and ensure that the velocity of inflation was kept at bay, the committee once again concluded that exceptionally low interest rates were warranted. The target range for the federal funds rate would remain in the 0%-.25% range. No surprises there.

What was surprising was what came after that. In each of the five previous statements the FOMC released in 2011, the committee included a nebulous timeframe for the low interest rate environment. “For an extended period” was the phrase we’d become accustomed to hearing.

But as the markets reeled in the wake of S&P’s unprecedented downgrade of the U.S. credit rating following an embarrassing debt-ceiling debate, the Fed unexpectedly changed the script. The extended period now had a window. “At least through mid-2013,” was what they said.

Never in recent memory has a Fed chair divulged a specific timeframe for changes in monetary policy. Economies are dynamic and require flexibility.  Paul Volcker would never have given us a time frame. Same goes for Alan Greenspan. And here was Ben Bernanke—a smart man, whether you like him or not—giving us dates. Peculiar, don’t you think?

What wasn’t peculiar was how the market reacted. After it was certain that money would be cheap for at least two more years, whatever panic selling was taking place ceased. Portfolio managers who had been sitting on the sidelines, arms folded in disgust at the way the debt-ceiling debate was handled, began to put money to work. The buyers’ strike was over and the market rallied, gaining back a nice chunk of what was lost in the early August earthquake. (The aftershocks continue, as we saw this week, but mainly because of Europe.)

But what’s good for the markets isn’t necessarily good for the U.S. economy. So why did he do it?

How about this for a theory: just because a Fed chair would never go on record as criticizing a sitting administration doesn’t mean he can’t do it in his own way.

That’s right, folks. By saying that the low-interest-rate environment would last through mid-2013, Ben Bernanke reassured one and all that he and the Fed do not anticipate a better outlook for the U.S. economy for at least two more years.

And by specifically choosing mid-2013—right about the time a new president would be settling in, were one to be elected—Ben Bernanke told us that unless my fellow Chicagoan makes some serious changes, things will not improve in this country.

“I’ve done all I can with the nation’s bank,” Bernanke seemed to say. “The headwinds out of Washington are simply too strong. Taxulationism and the anti-business climate created by the president and the treasury secretary are preventing the job creation we need to grow our economy. And the clowns in Congress are no better, playing with the live grenade of our nation’s AAA rating as if it were a harmless toy.

“Don’t blame me,” he seemed to say.  “I’m innocent of the blood of this battered economy.

“American voters: see ye to it.”

When he told us that the low-interest-rate environment would last through mid-2013, Ben Bernanke had his Pontius Pilate moment. He symbolically washed his hands of whatever shall become of the U.S. economy.

If Bernanke’s theory-cum-policy somehow works, great—Obama will keep his job, and Uncle Ben will be vindicated. If it doesn’t, oh well—Obama will be replaced by a republican, who will appoint a new Fed chair. Then it’ll be that guy’s problem.

Unfortunately, until either happens, it’s American people who get crucified.
Facebook / Twitter

John Ransom | Create Your Badge

See more top stories from Townhall Finance, new home page, more columns, more news:

Larry Kudlow The Deflationary M2 Explosion
John Ransom Barney Frank, Czar of His Domain
Craig Steiner Selling China the Rope to Hang Us
Bill Tatro Bernanke's Manslaughter of US Economy
Jack Bouroudjian Americans, the Crucified
Mike Shedlock The Obama Malaise
Bob Goldman Tough Love
Email Ransom

Join the conversation as a VIP Member


Trending on Townhall Video