Democrats Confirmed Once Again This Week How Racist They Are
CNN's Jake Tapper Really Doesn't Like Hunter Biden
Jon Ossoff Spends A LOT of Money on This Item...and He Puts Some...
DSA Assault on Prisons Is Rooted in Third Worldist Lust for Barbarism
New St. Louis DEA Leader Credits WH, Interagency Cooperation for Falling Fentanyl Overdose...
His Dishonor
The One Democrat Who's Getting Tough Questions From CNN
Ukrainian War Remakes War
The Democratic Socialists of America vs. the United States of America
Broad Tariffs on Semiconductors Risk Economic Harm and American Security
Despite a Decade of Controversy, the Semiquincentennial Pool Party Was a Blast
A President Who Chose a Higher Standard Than the Law Required
Echoes of the Roman Conquest of Jerusalem in Today’s Islamic Conquest of the...
The Mullahs Have Dropped the Mask—The Gulf Must Unite to End Tehran’s Reign...
NYPD: Suspect Screamed 'Allahu Akbar' During Upper West Side Stabbings
OPINION

Will America Accept Bureaucratic Rationing of Healthcare?

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Will America Accept Bureaucratic Rationing of Healthcare?

The numbers are as startling as tragic. According to the Daily Mail, “Up to 20,000 people have died needlessly early after being denied cancer drugs on the NHS, it was revealed yesterday. The rationing body NICE has failed to keep a promise to make more life-extending drugs available.”

Advertisement

British cancer patients are routinely denied access to critical life-extending drugs because of their costs.

The Telegraph noted two year ago, that the British health care system’s decision to deny patients four kidney cancer drugs on the NHS was denounced by doctors as 'poor' and 'unsuitable'. They said it was a "tragedy" that Britain's leading role in cancer research was not being translated into treatment for all patients, who were often left struggling to pay for the drugs themselves. The decision has led patients to mortgage their house in order to obtain the drugs and treatment they need to survive.

The occurrences on the other side of the pond are notable not because they are rare, but because they are commonplace. There are no howls of protests from patients who are powerless and are forced to live under the dictates of bureaucrats who make life and death decisions based upon budget constraints and not what’s best for the patients. This is the fundamental basis of government-run health care.

And Americans are perhaps 60 days away from our cancer patients suffering a similar fate.

That’s because the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has apparently opened the door to using cost as part of their evaluation process for drugs. The late-stage cancer drug Avastin has been proven effective in extending the life of cancer patients. Rather than testing the safety and efficacy of the drug, the FDA created a new standard that would allow patients who could afford the drug to use it, while those who cannot would be denied their use.

Advertisement

They are considering “de-labeling” the drug for breast cancer patients – essentially allowing Medicare and private insurance to deny coverage of the drug under their policies.

The FDA has moved a final decision about the fate of Avastin and breast cancer patients until after the elections. Not a great sign.

Will the American people accept the bureaucratic dictates that will deny them to a valuable treatment option or will they stand up and say rationing is not the American way?

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement