Did You See Newsweek's Headline About Biden's Fall at the Air Force Academy?
What Happened at the Air Force Academy Commencement Raises More Concerns About Biden's...
Feinstein's Office Initiates Biden-Like Protocol Regarding Interacting With the Media
Hunter Biden’s Defense of His Gun Crime Is Really Something
The McCarthy-Biden Debt Ceiling Deal Sends America Into Economic Demise
We Might Have Found the One 2024 GOP Candidate Who Would Not Make...
Conservatives Have Found Their Power
Shocker: Blue Jays Say Player Apologizing for Posting Pro-Bud Light Boycott Is Not...
Liberal DC-Area Activist Wants This for His Attacker Instead of Going to Jail
Looking Upwards, Rather Than Left or Right, for That Which Unites Us
Senate Hearing Sounds the Alarm on America’s Childcare Crisis
Disney Continues to Groom Children In the Creepiest Way Possible
Woke Women's Magazine Features ‘Trans Pregnant Man’ for ‘Pride Month’ Cover
Is This the Weirdest Primary Campaign Issue Yet?
Why Isn't Biden Campaigning?

Castro Valley Winery to Government: Crush Grapes, Not Vintners

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.

"You'll never meet anyone who says, 'I want to be a millionaire. I think I'll start a winery,'" owner Bill Smyth tells me from his small office over the tasting room of Westover Vineyards, nestled in Palomares Canyon. Smyth has worked in a number of fields. He made some money. He bought the vineyard property when he was young. His ex-wife bought him a kit to make wine, and his labor of love turned into a small business.

Now, thanks to heavy-handed California regulators, he's selling off his ports and boutique wines and turning his winery back into a home.

In July, California Department of Industrial Relations officials showed up at Westover Vineyards and slapped Smyth with $115,550 in fines, back wages and penalties. His bad: Like many other East Bay wineries, Westover benefits from the labor of volunteers to help with winemaking and pouring. Smyth offers a free course in winemaking; he says participants are free to help out or not. He has a legal form for volunteers. It reads: "I am donating my labor free by choice."

We're not talking about teens being pressed into grueling labor in hot fields. As one who enjoys the fruit and neighborhood feel of Livermore Valley wineries, I've met both volunteers and employees who started as volunteers. They tend to be middle-aged professionals who want a piece of the oenology dream.

Meteorologist Phil Vogt volunteered at Westover for three years. "It was a fantastic thing," he told me. He hoped to take up winemaking when he retired. He didn't want to be paid; it wasn't a job. He tried to return the check he received for back wages, but that, too, was illegal.

"I was not doing it to make money," Vogt added. "I have a day job that pays quite well. I was doing it to learn." His hobby, it turns out, is against the law. Vogt is not sure what he'll do next. Maybe he should take up robbing banks.

Smyth tells me investigators first visited Westover in July. On the spot, they handed him notices that he had violated the state's minimum wage law and wage reporting requirements and had to pay fines to the state, as well as back wages. No official had called him beforehand. The $115,550 came without warning for a business that grosses some $200,000 annually, nets $11,000 and is open to the public a mere 10 hours per week.

What prompted state scrutiny? Smyth suspects a "disgruntled person" who, he insists, was not a volunteer at the time of disgruntlement. He would not elaborate.

He only knows that he cannot stay in business if he has to pay the state and former volunteers the equivalent of 10 years' profit. Regulators could have sent him a cease-and-desist order. They could have fined him and made him pay back wages for anyone who complained. Instead, the state went big casino.

Department of Industrial Relations spokeswoman Erika Monterroza told me the labor code dictated the penalty. Smyth could have appealed, but he only appealed a $30,000 damage assessment. What public interest is served here? "I don't think there is public interest in putting this gentleman out of business," Monterroza answered. "But in situations where businesses are not paying their workers, it's in violation of the law." Wineries that pay people have to compete with vintners staffed by volunteers.

Assemblyman Bob Wieckowski went to kindergarten with Smyth. He plans to sit down with Department of Industrial Relations Director Christine Baker. "The state has an interest to make sure that people aren't exploited, and they should be paid," Wieckowski told me. That said, he's not sure the state needs to intervene in business-killing fashion for "some retiree from the Livermore Labs who wants to learn how to make port." Yet that is what the law says. Any scheme that would allow the state to pick which businesses are worthy of exemption and which are not has problems, too.

Here's a radical idea: California could allow adults to make adult decisions, such as whether they want to be volunteers. If they don't want to, they don't have to.

I watch as Smyth sells three heavily discounted cases to Livermore Realtor Cindy Williams, who called ahead to make an emergency pickup for a party. Is Smyth really going to close shop? If the state reduced what he has to pay to the $29,375 he already has paid in back wages, Smyth shrugs, the economics could work out. But it is not going to happen.

Smyth cannot believe that the state has the authority to outlaw a consenting relationship between adult wine lovers and a winemaker. And what of the romance of the grape? Smyth's wife, Jill, started as a volunteer. Now, he confides, "they've taken the love and the passion out. They're making it a job."

Join the conversation as a VIP Member


Trending on Townhall Video