Democrats Are Right to Be Scared of Trump’s Vengeance
Kevin McCallister's Grocery Bill Would Be Insane Today. Did You Catch Where the...
Here's What Could Have Happened If Two Off-Duty Cops Didn't Walk by the...
'Diversity Hires' And Progressive Hatred Highlight Everything Wrong With Democrats
The Real Dictators
Look Out: Russians Adding Technology to Their Arsenal of Terror
Deranged Democrats Claim Trump Will Be a Dictator
The Problematic Ousting of Rep. George Santos from Congress
The Frozen Chosen Got Stuck In Munich, Of All Places
Why Congress Should Stay Out of the Credit Card Industry
There Was One Major Detail Missing From the Hunter Biden Indictment
Why SNL Is Under Fired Over 'Vile' Skit On Harvard, UPenn, MIT Presidents
Democrat Makes Damning Admission On the 'Legally Justified' Hunter Biden Indictments
Newsom Humiliated By Disastrous Budget Report One Week After Bragging About California's E...
The Strange Way Exiled George Santos Is Raking In Money

Oberlin Punished for Fact-Free Food Fight

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of
AP Photo/Dake Kang

Oberlin College in Ohio has devolved into one of academe's most infamous examples of political correctness, one of those unwelcoming places that rails against anyone who brings speakers to campus if those speakers upset Oberlin's crusades against the racist/sexist/anti-gay menace.


Now Oberlin's administration is being punished in a very significant way for a very significant offense, and it's about time. It has taken political correctness to an abusive extreme. The Wall Street Journal opinion section headline summed it up: "Oberlin Pays for Smearing the Town Grocer." It has been ordered to pay $44 million in damages to Gibson's Food Market and Bakery. How so?

On Nov. 9, 2016, a black male Oberlin student attempted to buy wine at Gibson's using a fake ID. Allyn Gibson, a grandson of the market owner, refused to sell alcohol to the underage student and then noticed he was hiding two bottles of wine under his shirt. Gibson called the police, and the student tried to run off, dropping the bottles on the floor. When Gibson pursued him, it turned violent. Police arrived to see Gibson on the ground being beaten by the black male and two black female Oberlin students.

In court, all three students pleaded guilty, and the male suspect swore in a plea statement that Gibson "'was within his legal rights' to detain him, and that he did not believe Gibson's actions were racially motivated," said the Journal.

Yet none of this stopped Oberlin's students and administrators from mangling the truth. Because the assailants were black, students raucously protested, falsely claiming the store was racist. Worse yet, Meredith Raimondo, Oberlin's dean of students, "handed out a flier accusing Gibson's of having a 'long account of racial profiling and discrimination,'" the Journal said.


The Gibson family sued Oberlin and Raimondo, seeking $12.8 million at trial on a number of counts including libel, intentional infliction of emotional distress and interference with business contracts. The college canceled the store's longstanding food contracts. Boycotts and controversy took their toll. The store owners took no salary for two years, and nearly all the staff members were laid off. Gibson's lawyers lamented that if they did not receive a ruling in their favor, they would be forced to close up shop. But the truth won.

Raimondo led a crusade inside the Oberlin administration. A text message was read during the trial in which she discussed whether to "unleash the students" on Gibson's. This was war.

Cornell Law professor William Jacobson, who covered the case persistently on his blog, Legal Insurrection, told Fox News host Tucker Carlson that the Gibsons did nothing wrong. They were literally just minding their business that morning when they called the cops on a shoplifter. "Because of the crazed ... so-called social justice movement on our campuses, they were immediately designated oppressor, in part because of their skin color, in part because they're the owner of a business," Jacobson said. "And they were put into a pigeon hole of someone who ... must have engaged in racial profiling."


A massive verdict against a prestigious private college must have been national news, right? It wasn't. The same networks that savored every morsel of the scandal of Hollywood actresses partaking in college admissions scams offered nothing on Oberlin's defeat. Only Fox News found the facts of this disturbing court case worth discussing.

This is why the other networks hate Fox News with a passion. They can't bury these stories so a national audience never hears them. They prefer the narrative that political correctness never, ever goes wrong.

L. Brent Bozell III is the president of the Media Research Center. Tim Graham is director of media analysis at the Media Research Center and executive editor of the blog 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member


Trending on Townhall Videos