Elizabeth Warren Reacts to the UnitedHealth CEO Murder in Typical Fashion
Trump Responds to Wray's Resignation
The Mystery Drones Are From Where?!
Here's the First Democratic Senator to Join Truth Social
FBI Director Christopher Wray Announces His Resignation
Matt Gaetz's Next Move Announced
What the Media Keeps Omitting From Discussions of 'Ghost Guns'
Blinken Testifies at the Long-Awaited House Hearing on the Afghanistan Withdrawal
This State Will Lease Land for Trump’s Deportation Plans
ActBlue Drops Bombshell Confession Before Congress
Another One: A Blue-to-Red Party Flip, This Time In...
The EU Will Crack Down on Illegal Immigration at This Border
Daniel Penny Speaks Out in Tell-All Interview
After Trump Taunts Him, Trudeau Scolds Americans for Not Electing Harris
Trump Names Career Lawman Over Political Insider to Lead Embattled ICE
OPINION

Oberlin Punished for Fact-Free Food Fight

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
AP Photo/Dake Kang

Oberlin College in Ohio has devolved into one of academe's most infamous examples of political correctness, one of those unwelcoming places that rails against anyone who brings speakers to campus if those speakers upset Oberlin's crusades against the racist/sexist/anti-gay menace.

Advertisement

Now Oberlin's administration is being punished in a very significant way for a very significant offense, and it's about time. It has taken political correctness to an abusive extreme. The Wall Street Journal opinion section headline summed it up: "Oberlin Pays for Smearing the Town Grocer." It has been ordered to pay $44 million in damages to Gibson's Food Market and Bakery. How so?

On Nov. 9, 2016, a black male Oberlin student attempted to buy wine at Gibson's using a fake ID. Allyn Gibson, a grandson of the market owner, refused to sell alcohol to the underage student and then noticed he was hiding two bottles of wine under his shirt. Gibson called the police, and the student tried to run off, dropping the bottles on the floor. When Gibson pursued him, it turned violent. Police arrived to see Gibson on the ground being beaten by the black male and two black female Oberlin students.

In court, all three students pleaded guilty, and the male suspect swore in a plea statement that Gibson "'was within his legal rights' to detain him, and that he did not believe Gibson's actions were racially motivated," said the Journal.

Yet none of this stopped Oberlin's students and administrators from mangling the truth. Because the assailants were black, students raucously protested, falsely claiming the store was racist. Worse yet, Meredith Raimondo, Oberlin's dean of students, "handed out a flier accusing Gibson's of having a 'long account of racial profiling and discrimination,'" the Journal said.

Advertisement

The Gibson family sued Oberlin and Raimondo, seeking $12.8 million at trial on a number of counts including libel, intentional infliction of emotional distress and interference with business contracts. The college canceled the store's longstanding food contracts. Boycotts and controversy took their toll. The store owners took no salary for two years, and nearly all the staff members were laid off. Gibson's lawyers lamented that if they did not receive a ruling in their favor, they would be forced to close up shop. But the truth won.

Raimondo led a crusade inside the Oberlin administration. A text message was read during the trial in which she discussed whether to "unleash the students" on Gibson's. This was war.

Cornell Law professor William Jacobson, who covered the case persistently on his blog, Legal Insurrection, told Fox News host Tucker Carlson that the Gibsons did nothing wrong. They were literally just minding their business that morning when they called the cops on a shoplifter. "Because of the crazed ... so-called social justice movement on our campuses, they were immediately designated oppressor, in part because of their skin color, in part because they're the owner of a business," Jacobson said. "And they were put into a pigeon hole of someone who ... must have engaged in racial profiling."

Advertisement

A massive verdict against a prestigious private college must have been national news, right? It wasn't. The same networks that savored every morsel of the scandal of Hollywood actresses partaking in college admissions scams offered nothing on Oberlin's defeat. Only Fox News found the facts of this disturbing court case worth discussing.

This is why the other networks hate Fox News with a passion. They can't bury these stories so a national audience never hears them. They prefer the narrative that political correctness never, ever goes wrong.

L. Brent Bozell III is the president of the Media Research Center. Tim Graham is director of media analysis at the Media Research Center and executive editor of the blog NewsBusters.org. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos