The Latest Graham Platner Allegation Just Dropped
The Hill Clutches Pearls About Vice President Vance's Book Royalties
Here's the Despicable Reason Why MS NOW Says Platner's Latest Accuser Is More...
Meet the Man Preserving the Stories of World War II Veterans
Here's the Most Deranged Reaction to the FIFA Red Card Retraction
The Wisconsin Congressional Staffer Who Called for 'Trans Jihad' Got Fired, Doubled Down...
Trump Tells the International Criminal Court to Go Pound Sand
Francesca Hong Would Put the Palestinian Cause Ahead of Wisconsin Voters
An Ex-KKK Grand Wizard Just Praised One of NYC's Newly Elected Democratic Socialists
Abandoning Milton Friedman Is a Gift to the Socialist Left
Cuba Just Suffered a Nationwide Blackout
This Democrat Senator Was Cheering For Mexico in the World Cup
The View's Sunny Hostin Claims American Flags Make Her Feel 'Unsafe'
Platner Loses Major Endorsements After Sexual Assault Allegation
The Media Hates That Trump Saved U.S. Soccer
OPINION

Hagel Nomination: Iranians Giddy

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Hagel Nomination: Iranians Giddy

As the Senate prepares to hold a January 31 confirmation hearing for their former colleague Chuck Hagel to be the next Secretary of Defense, an alarming paradox has emerged.  Iran – the "Death to America" Islamic regime – is effusive with praise, while a large group of retired U.S. military commanders have "deep concerns" and have taken a highly unusual public position in opposition to Hagel's nomination.  

Advertisement

The Washington Times cites an Iranian source that received the news of Hagel's nomination as "a message of peace from the Obama administration to the Islamic Republic of Iran" and admiringly quoted Hagel's condemnation of sanctions against Iran.  Not surprisingly, the Iranians and are also giddy over Hagel's past anti-Israel statements and criticism of the "Jewish lobby" in the U.S.

Additionally, the regime controlled English press outlet in Tehran says the Iranians believe that a new SecDef Hagel would help craft a "grand bargain" between the U.S. and Iran.  That bargain, they believe, would be accepting of the current Islamic regime and their quest for nuclear capabilities, while turning a blind eye as the regime squashes the pro-freedom opposition.  Read the full article here.

Meanwhile a distinguished group of retired military commanders have taken a highly unusual public position in opposition to the Hagel nomination.  The group includes nine retired Army, Air Force, and Marine Generals and Five Navy Admirals, including Paul Valley, Major General U.S. Army (ret), who is a contributing editor to A Line of Sight.com and Founder and Chairman of Stand Up America.  

In a January 29 letter sent to Senators Carl Levin (D-MI) and Jim Inhofe (R-OK), the Chairman and Ranking Republican on the Senate Armed Services Committee, the group of flag and general officers raised the following serious concerns and concluded that, "For all of these reasons, it is our professional assessment that confirmation of Sen. Hagel to be Secretary of Defense would be contrary to the United States' vital national security interests."  Full letter here.

Advertisement
  • Sen. Hagel’s support for further cuts to the defense budget.  Sen. Hagel stated in late August 2011 that the Pentagon is “bloated” and needs to be “pared down”, contrary to Sec. Panetta’s and Chairman Dempsey’s views that sequestration – the additional hundreds of billions in across-the-board cuts to defense that go well beyond the $787 billion in cuts already sustained by the Department since Sec. Gates’ tenure – would be “disastrous for the defense budget” and “very high risk” to national security;
  • Sen. Hagel’s support for the global elimination of nuclear weapons.  Sen. Hagel is a public supporter of the “Global Zero” Initiative, the goal of which is the “elimination of all nuclear weapons.”  This stance is ill-advised for any Secretary of Defense, as Russia and China continue to modernize their nuclear capabilities while North Korea and Iran move closer to obtaining them.
  • Sen. Hagel’s hostility towards Israel.  Sen. Hagel has demonstrated an abiding hostility towards Israel, a view that would be detrimental to ournational defense and perhaps perilous to our only stable, reliable ally in the Middle East were he to become Secretary.
  •  Sen. Hagel’s outlook towards Iran.  Sen. Hagel repeatedly opposed sanctions against Iran while serving in the Senate, and in 2006 stated that "a military strike against Iran, a military option, is not a viable, feasible, responsible option” – an ill-advised statement that undercuts the effectiveness of both diplomatic and military policies to prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons capabilities.
Advertisement

Signers to the letter are as follows:

Adm. James “Ace” Lyons, USN (Ret.)

Lt. Gen. William G. "Jerry" Boykin, USA (Ret.)

Vice Adm. Robert Monroe, USN (Ret.)

Lt. Gen. E.G. “Buck” Shuler, Jr., USAF (Ret.)

Maj. Gen. Thomas F. Cole, USA (Ret.)

Maj. Gen. Vincent E. Falter, USA (Ret.)

Rear Adm. H.E. Gerhard, USN (Ret.)

Rear Adm. Robert H. Gormley, USN (Ret.)

Maj. Gen. Geoffrey Higginbotham, USMC (Ret.)

Rear Adm. Don G. Primeau, USN (Ret.)

Maj. Gen. Mel Thrash, USA (Ret.)

Maj. Gen. Paul E. Vallely, USA (Ret.)

Brig. Gen. William A. Bloomer, USMC (Ret.)

Brig. Gen. Ronald K. Kerwood, USA (Ret.)

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement