There's One Figure in WaPo/ABC News' Poll on Biden That's a Potential Election...
How Dave Portnoy Reacted to a NYT Reporter Roaming Around His Pizza Festival
So, That's Why Zelensky Can Wine and Dine With the World's Finest With...
Texas National Guardsmen Attempt to Stop the Flow of Illegal Immigrants Into Eagle...
Joe Biden Hates You (Hate Him Back)
Biden-Migration: More Aliens Than 32 States
The Democrats Will Never Do That in America!
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 184: Psalm 27 - For Those Who Need...
Cheering for America
What’s the Matter with Latin America, and the Media?
Why We'll 'Definitely' Be Talking About Trump's Heartbeat Comments for Months
The Message of Deion Sanders
My Loyalty Is to the Lord, Not to a Political Candidate or Party
The Left Throws Joe Biden Under the Bus: 'Nightmare Scenario for Democrats'
Does This Mean Newsom Is Running for President?

A Study in Morals

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of

"Moral authority." Hmm. Who shoe-horned that notion into the national conversation?

According to former Vice President Joe Biden, moral authority is the property that Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam forfeited when a photo from his 1984 medical school yearbook page came to light and he couldn't clearly say whether or not it depicted him in blackface or Klan costume -- though, he conceded, he once blackened his face for a Michael Jackson costume. Calls for his resignation resounded. Biden chipped in with gusto.


How the governor, on Biden's showing, forfeited his "moral authority" isn't 100 percent clear. Maybe his willingness 35 years ago to kid or mock African-Americans showed his essential worthlessness.

Or maybe -- a trifle likelier -- the vitality of the Democrats' alliance with African-Americans required Northam's leperization, to which deed Biden applied himself by appealing to the moral norms as defined by ... well, Biden.

As the former VP and prospective president raises the question, we might want to gaze over Northam's anguished head and ask: What, after all, is moral authority these days? And who has the right to talk about it?

I hazard a guess: Moral authority is anything that political expediency obliges politicians to say it is. This is because politicians mostly run our lives these days, having wrested, through the ballot box and sheer presumption, the power of defining right and wrong. Biden, for example, -- once famous for plagiarizing the speeches of a British Labor Party leader -- has ruled Northam an embarrassment needing to be dumped on an outgoing load of political rubbish. Not a lot of nuance here, Joe, not a lot of charity -- least of all, having to do with how Northam thinks and acts today versus 35 years ago. But so we talk these days.

We really don't care for other people's views. We mostly care for our own. As David Brooks has observed: "(W)e have seen a broad shift from a culture of humility to the culture of what you might call the Big Me, from a culture that encouraged people to think humbly of themselves to a culture that encourages people to see themselves as the center of the universe."


To put it another way, we've become authorities on what's authoritative: on what to believe and what not to believe. We like and listen to the authorities we have picked out on account of the congruence of their views and our own. We choose Fox News over CNN, Kimmel over Rush -- such being our First Amendment right.

We reduce moral understanding to the level of what I want, what I need. We readjust the ancient norms of the human race -- proceeding from natural law, religion and experience -- to options as distinguished from truths once generally seen as embodying ideas about human good and therefore worthy of propagation.

The irony of Biden's moral rebuke of Northam isn't Biden's personally compromised record on moral authority. The true and abiding irony is the text Biden chose to take on Northam's unfitness for office. He criticized a 35-year-old photo. He ignored the governor's "tut-tut, never mind" about a bill in the Virginia Assembly that would loosen present safeguards against infanticide of a baby born alive during a late-term abortion. The governor, a pediatric neurologist by trade, scarcely blinked when interviewed about procedures already standard in such relatively rare cases. The "infant" -- he was clear, anyway, about that descriptive -- would be delivered and resuscitated "if that's what the mother and the family desired, and then a discussion would ensue between the physician and the mother." And maybe the kid would live. And maybe, again, he wouldn't be allowed to.


We don't use the term "moral authority" here. We call it "moral relativism" -- maybe life, maybe death. Whatever. No hint of moral horror escaped the governor's lips, even as he recounted the facts. Moral horror we leave for other life situations, such as the prospect of alienating a key voting bloc and possibly, in consequence, losing an election and then -- horror of horrors -- losing political power.

One thing we must admit about Joe Biden, in contrast with a mere Virginia governor: He knows what makes the modern world go round. And it's not morality.

William Murchison is writing a book on American moral restoration in the 21st century. His latest book is "The Cost of Liberty: The Life of John Dickinson." 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member


Trending on Townhall Videos