It's Time for the Epstein Story to Be Buried
A New Poll Shows Old Media Resistance, and Nicolle Wallace Decides Which Country...
Is Free Speech Really the Highest Value?
Dan Patrick Was Right — Carrie Prejean Boller Had to Go
The Antisemitism Broken Record
Before Protesting ICE, Learn How Government Works
Republican Congress Looks Like a Democrat Majority on TV News
Immigration Is Shaking Up Political Parties in Britain, Europe and the US
Representing the United States on the World Stage Is a Privilege, Not a...
Older Generations Teach the Lost Art of Romance
Solving the Just About Unsolvable Russo-Ukrainian War
20 Alleged 'Free Money' Gang Members Indicted in Houston on RICO, Murder, and...
'Green New Scam' Over: Trump Eliminates 2009 EPA Rule That Fueled Unpopular EV...
Tim Walz Wants Taxpayers to Give $10M in Forgivable Loans to Riot-Torn Businesses
The SAVE Act Fight Ends When It Lands on Trump's Desk for Signature
Tipsheet

UPDATE: Questions Swirl After Explosion Along Poland-Ukraine Border

UPDATE: Questions Swirl After Explosion Along Poland-Ukraine Border
Yuri Kochetkov/Pool Photo via AP

Amid Putin's long-running war against Ukraine, a new volley of what were initially identified by an American official as Russian missiles that missed their presumed intended target in Ukraine and landed Poland on Tuesday, a strike that killed at least two Polish citizens and left sizable craters where they landed. According to reports, the missiles hit a village, Przewodów, near Poland's border in an area where locals were drying grain. 

Advertisement

The strike initially raised the stakes of the war that's been raging since Putin's forces invaded Ukraine on February 24. Until now, other nations have provided training, support, and war machinery to the two countries in conflict, but have not gotten directly involved on behalf of Russia or Ukraine. But because Poland is a member of NATO, it could invoke Article 5 of the NATO charter if attacked, triggering the alliance's collective defense provision where "an attack against one Ally is considered as an attack against all Allies."

That would draw in the United States, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, and the rest of NATO's membership.

The invocation of Article 5 does not necessarily mean that all NATO member countries would immediately deploy fighting forces to take on Russia, as allies "can provide any form of assistance they deem necessary to respond to a situation and "each ally is responsible for determining what it deems necessary in the particular circumstances."

Advertisement

Related:

RUSSIA

The United States intelligence community initially, following the missile strike, confirmed to The Associated Press that the missiles were Russian-fired and claimed at least two lives in Poland, again raising the specter that the free world could end up at war against Russia. In February, President Biden said that "the United States will defend every inch of NATO territory with the full force of American power," though Biden was not clear if he meant that against outright invasion by Russia or even in instances like the one that played out on Tuesday in Poland. 

In Tuesday's State Department press briefing, officials were asked whether the Biden administration remained committed to the president's pledge. "I don't want to speculate about hypotheticals," the State Department replied. Not exactly a resounding statement of support.  

In Poland, government spokesman Piotr Mueller told reporters that his country's leadership was holding an emergency meeting as a result of the "crisis situation."

This kind of development in Russia's war on Ukraine could provide the pretext needed to provoke some version of World War III by dragging NATO into the conflict via Article 5, but concrete action in response to the missiles' presumably accidental strike in Poland was slow to develop as the world awaited a response from Warsaw and/or NATO. 

Advertisement

In some confusing remarks from President Biden later on Tuesday night in the United States but early in the morning in Bali, where Biden currently is on a foreign trip, he claimed "It's unlikely, in the minds of the trajectory, that it was fired from Russia."

What exactly "in the minds of the trajectory" means is up for interpretation, but it's notable that Biden would share his doubt that the projectile "was fired from Russia" and that it seemingly contradicted what Biden's own intelligence officials confirmed to The Associated Press.

By the early morning hours of Wednesday in the U.S., AP reported that U.S. officials said their "initial findings suggest" that the missile was fired by Ukrainian forces in an attempt to stop an incoming Russian missile. 

Advertisement

Editor's Note: This story was updated to include Biden's latest statement on the explosion in Poland and contradictory claims from U.S. officials who initially confirmed the missile was Russian but later walked back that claim to say they believe it was a Ukrainian-fired defensive munition.

This is a developing story and may be updated further. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos