How My 2025 Predictions Went – and Some Predictions for 2026
While America Watched the Border, the Cyber Front Exploded
Let’s All Hope 2026 Brings Us Some Real ‘News’ Outlets
If Elected CA Governor, Eric Swalwell Vows to Weaponize Government Against ICE Agents
'Just Fine:' WI Governor Tony Evers Continues to Withhold SNAP Data From the...
With Islam on the Rise, Gay European Voters Shift to the Right
Yeah, Culture Does Matter
Obamacare Was, Is and Will Always Be a Problem
Oligarchies, Terrorism, Greed, and Other Obstacles to Forecasting the Future
Minnesota’s Fraud Is Blowing the Lid Off a Broken Election System
The Danger of Nick Fuentes' Ideology
Will the US Senate Stall Much-Needed Permitting Reforms?
Video of Woman Saying 'Fraud Is Bad' Fuels Scrutiny of Minnesota Childcare Program
Former Real Estate Professional Convicted in $2.4M Investor Fraud Scheme
New Media Shine While Legacy Media Die
Tipsheet

Federal Judge Renders Judgement on a Cornerstone Obama Program

AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta

Barack Obama’s Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program was expansive. It was a cornerstone immigration initiative for his administration. It was also illegal. Created by executive order, the DACA program was a gross violation of separation of powers. The White House was re-writing immigration law unilaterally, an ongoing criticism of the order that spurred this legal battle. Now, a federal judge has ruled the program is unconstitutional but didn’t order that the program be scrapped immediately (via NYT):

Advertisement


A federal judge in Texas again ruled unlawful on Wednesday a program that has shielded hundreds of thousands of undocumented young adults from deportation and allowed them to legally work in the United States, rejecting a new rule that the Biden administration had introduced to address the court’s concerns. 

The judge, Andrew S. Hanen of the Federal District Court in Houston, maintained that President Barack Obama exceeded his authority when he created the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, or DACA, by executive action in 2012. 

The decision is the latest twist in a five-year-long court saga that has left the program and its beneficiaries, known as Dreamers, hanging in the balance. While the ruling is a blow to the immigrants, the judge did not mandate an immediate end to the program. Current applicants will be able to keep and renew their protection. No new applications will be allowed. 

“There are no material differences between the two programs,” the judge wrote in his 40-page opinion, adding that his decision did not compel the government to “take any immigration, deportation or criminal action against any DACA recipient.” 

Advertisement

It’s frustrating, though not unexpected. The program has been active for years. If there’s a rollback, it will be done gradually. And there will be appeals. For now, current applicants are safe. Protections for new applicants will not be afforded. It’s détente for now, which will not satisfy the program's detractors. 

Advertisement

It's illegal but can still remain–that's essentially the takeaway. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement