Regime Media Journalists, Besides Being Commies, Are Terrible at Their Jobs
Joe Kent Reportedly Wanted to Testify in the Trial of Charlie Kirk’s Assassin....
This Deep State Clown Humiliated Himself on CNN...and Then Doubled Down
Hakeem Jeffries Was Asked the an Easy Question. He Failed Miserably Answering It.
And With That Tweet, Joe Kent Seems to Backtrack the Whole 'Israel Is...
The Reactions to the Chappell Roan's Fan Incident in Brazil Have Been Gold
Will Rep. Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick Be Expelled From Congress? We'll Find Out Soon.
Scott Jennings Trounced This Former Congresswoman in a Debate Over Operation Epic Fury
Philly DA Larry Krasner Vows to Arrest ICE Agents Working at Airports
Here Are Iran's Laughable Demands for Ceasefire Talks
Jews in the Land of the Setting Sun
The Equal Pay Hoax Is Dead. Choices Are Women’s Real Empowerment.
Time to Demand International Control of Iran’s Qeshm Island to Ensure an Open...
March Madness Shines Light on Teen Boys’ Obsession With Online Gambling, Not Just...
May Day’s Real Targets? America’s Students
Tipsheet

Digging In: US Sending Tanks to Eastern Europe

Digging In: US Sending Tanks to Eastern Europe

The United States will be sending dozens of tanks, armored vehicles and howitzers to eastern Europe in response to Russian aggression in Ukraine. The vehicles will be enough to arm an entire combat brigade, and will be spread throughout Estonia, Lithuania, Latvia, Bulgaria, Romania and Poland. U.S. Defense Secretary Ashton Carter said the vehicles will be utilized for training and exercises.

Advertisement

The move is meant to reassure NATO allies in eastern Europe that the U.S. stands behind them. "We need to explain to those who doubt the value of our NATO commitments that the security of Europe is vital to everything else we hold dear," Carter said.

The move is more symbolic than substantive, however. During the Cold War, West Germany alone was home to a U.S. armored brigade. Now, that same amount of strength will be distributed across six countries.

Even as the move is a welcome step in protecting NATO allies, it comes nearly a year late. It has been about a year since Russian-backed rebels took over Crimea in east Ukraine and declared its independence. That move demonstrated Putin's will to reassemble parts of the old Soviet empire — an aim that eastern European nations have expressed concern over. Carter himself alluded to this Russian aim:

"One of [Putin's] stated views is a longing for the past and that's where we have a different perspective on the world and even on Russia's future," [Carter] told reporters en route to Germany, in response to a question about whether Putin is a rational actor. "We'd like to see us all moving forward, Europe moving forward, and that does not seem to be his stated perspective."

Russia has also been flexing its nuclear muscle of late, announcing last week that it has added 40 new ballistic missiles to its nuclear arsenal. But Carter downplayed the move:

Advertisement

"Nuclear weapons are not something that should be the subject of loose rhetoric by world leadership," Carter said. "We all understand the gravity of nuclear dangers. We all understand that Russia is a long established nuclear power. There is no need for Vladimir Putin to make that point."

The decision to send armored vehicles will likely go without any controversy. Many observers only wish the move had been made earlier and with greater resolve. Orysia Lutsevych, a scholar at Chatham House in London, expressed this view:

The Obama administration "should have pushed the Kremlin before reaching to the kind of moment of escalation we are having right now," Lutsevych said. "By trying to appease the Kremlin too long, we will be facing with a higher cost every day."

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement