It's Time for the Epstein Story to Be Buried
A New Poll Shows Old Media Resistance, and Nicolle Wallace Decides Which Country...
Is Free Speech Really the Highest Value?
Dan Patrick Was Right — Carrie Prejean Boller Had to Go
The Antisemitism Broken Record
Before Protesting ICE, Learn How Government Works
Republican Congress Looks Like a Democrat Majority on TV News
Immigration Is Shaking Up Political Parties in Britain, Europe and the US
Representing the United States on the World Stage Is a Privilege, Not a...
Older Generations Teach the Lost Art of Romance
Solving the Just About Unsolvable Russo-Ukrainian War
20 Alleged 'Free Money' Gang Members Indicted in Houston on RICO, Murder, and...
'Green New Scam' Over: Trump Eliminates 2009 EPA Rule That Fueled Unpopular EV...
Tim Walz Wants Taxpayers to Give $10M in Forgivable Loans to Riot-Torn Businesses
The SAVE Act Fight Ends When It Lands on Trump's Desk for Signature
Tipsheet

Senate Majority PAC Claims Domestic Violence Victims 'Deserve Better' Than Joni Ernst, Who Is a Victim

Senate Majority PAC Claims Domestic Violence Victims 'Deserve Better' Than Joni Ernst, Who Is a Victim
AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin

Sen. Joni Ernst (R-IA) has been candid about having been the victim of rape and domestic violence. It's one of the reasons she's so passionate about passing a bipartisan reauthorization of the Violence Against Women Act. It's no wonder then, why several Twitter users advised a Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer-linked Super PAC to delete the following message for Ernst following her opposition to the Senate Democrats' version of the bill.

Advertisement

"This is disgusting," "You really didn't think this one out," and "Delete this" were some of the wisest responses I read. 

Ernst has been open about having been assaulted by a boyfriend in college, and later physically abused by her husband. She volunteered in a shelter in Ames, Iowa for two years working the crisis line, and working directly in the shelter with women and children. In other words, VAWA has a personal meaning to her. 

"This is a big issue for me," she told a group of reporters on the hill on Tuesday.

"After my sexual assault in college, I had that crisis line that I could call," she said. "When my husband abused me a decade ago, I had a victims' advocate at the courthouse. It was funded by provisions through this type of activity. I can't imagine not having those supports available to me."

"I don't know where I would have gone," she continued. "I was ashamed and embarrassed. I didn't want to tell our friends what had happened. So having that lifeline of support outside of my circle of friends was important to me, and it helped me find my way through that very difficult time."

Advertisement

So, with VAWA at risk of not being reauthorized next year, she went to work on a bipartisan measure. She thought she was getting somewhere too, until Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) walked away at the eleventh hour. Ernst believes it was at the behest of Schumer. The bipartisan bill they rejected addresses female genital mutilation, which she notes is not in the Democrats' version. Her offering also triples the amount of funding that is available for education and sexual assault prevention, and enhances penalties for abusers.

The Democrats' offering, on the other hand, is "full of political talking points."

There were several provisions that the Democrats "refused to budge on," Ernst explained. For instance, their bill includes "retroactive" gun penalties against abusers. 

"If you were convicted of domestic violence 30 years ago, you can have your gun rights taken away today," Ernst warned. "That doesn't allow for due process. That doesn't follow the Constitution. So that was a non-starter."

The Democrats themselves have noted that their bill probably won't get over the finish line.

"What is the point of introducing their bill when they themselves acknowledge this will go nowhere?" the senator wondered.

Ernst also rejected the Democrats' accusation that her bill does not provide extra protections for the LGBT community. Is there any truth to that?

Advertisement

"No," she said. "Housing is available to everyone, regardless of gender, race, ethnicity. So there are basic tenets laid out already for those who wish to receive that kind of shelter assistance."

"It is not cutting out the LGBT community," she added. "It does not do that. It does not change the language."

Her bill, she explained, is not a Republican bill. She's put in eight months of effort into it already and she was adamant that it's so important to reauthorize VAWA that if need be she'd "take her name off of it" if it would make Schumer happy.

"My bill is a bill for survivors," she said. 

In case you're wondering, Ernst did respond to the PAC's suggestion. She told Schumer to keep his opinions to himself.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement