Gavin Newsom Funded an NGO That Brings HIV-Positive 'Migrants' to America
Anti-ICE Protesters Are Stalking Federal Employees in Minneapolis
Newsweek Runs Headline on Story It Calls Unverified, and the Press Dumping on...
'They Just Care About Power.' Scott Jennings Lays Out What Virginia Redistricting Was...
California Sees Drop in Homicides. There's A Reason for That and Leftists Won't...
Vivek Ramaswamy Slams Critique of Israeli Aid and Some People's Odd Obsession With...
A Virginia Circuit Court Has Just Ruled The State's New Congressional Map Unconstitutional
Here's Why The Situation In Iran is Looking Disastrous For China
Pennsylvania Woman Accused of Selling Pandemic Unemployment Approvals to Ineligible Claima...
New York Times Podcast Calls Shoplifting 'Political Protest' and Defends the Killing of...
Trump's Chief of Staff Reportedly Tells Cabinet Members to Focus on Domestic Issues...
High-Tech Car Thieves Used Key Fob Devices to Steal Over 130 Vehicles, Feds...
Navy Secretary Phelan Exits Administration Immediately, Is Replaced With Hung Cao
DOJ Files Complaint Against DC Water Over 200-Million-Gallon Sewage Spill into Potomac Riv...
Five Romanians Charged in $1M Scheme to Steal SNAP Benefits From Low-Income Families...
Tipsheet

GOP, Dems Unite to Demand Increased Iranian Sanctions One Year After Nuclear Deal

GOP, Dems Unite to Demand Increased Iranian Sanctions One Year After Nuclear Deal

It's now been a year since the Obama administration announced their plans for the naive Iranian nuclear deal. Despite multiple warnings about how Iran would not comply with the legislation, the White House moved forward with the signatures and, as expected, Iran has not been a cooperative partner as they promised. For instance, they have reportedly continued their ballistic missile program, even just as recently as this past week, and have been uncooperative when it comes to American officials wanting to inspect their nuclear facilities.

Advertisement

This context justifies the need for the Iran Sanctions Act. The legislation, introduced this week on a bipartisan basis by Sens. Dan Sullivan (R-AK), Bob Corker (R-TN), Robert Menendez (D-NJ), Marco Rubio (R-FL), and Joe Manchin (D-WV),  would expand sanctions for ballistic missile development, support for terrorism, sanction transfers of conventional weapons to or from Iran and codify the prohibition on “U-turn” transactions involving Iran, according to a press release from Sen. Sullivan's office.

“Since its signing, we’ve seen attempt after attempt by the Iranian regime to undermine, circumvent or blatantly disregard the conditions they agreed to exactly one year ago. Ignoring clear violations of the deal without reproach only emboldens the regime to act further. For the sake of U.S. national security and the global fight against terrorism, Congress must act when the Obama administration is not prepared to. That is why I am pleased to have worked with my colleagues on a bill that recognizes that the Iranian threat still exists.”

Three other measures to rein in Iranian aggression passed last week. The U.S. Financial System Protection Act (H.R. 4992) prevents Iran from gaining access to the U.S. financial system and GOP Leader Kevin McCarthy’s Iran Accountability Act of 2016 (H.R. 5631) will impose new sanctions on Iran in response to its continued illegal development of ballistic missiles. The No Heavy Water From Act would stop the U.S. from purchasing Iran's heavy water. 

Advertisement

In other news, a resolution has been introduced demanding Iran release Iranian-Americans who were jailed without proper cause.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos