GOP Voters Are RINO Hunting
NRCC Is Going to Be Ready for War...the Dems Not So Much
The Replies to This Cenk Uygur Tweet About Ed Gallrein Were Brutal
Let's See Who Will Defend the Latest Fiasco Involving Graham Platner
Iran Threatens War 'Beyond the Region' if the US Resumes Attacks
Ilhan Omar's Response When Questioned About Minnesota Fraud Scandal Tells Us All We...
If Voter Fraud Doesn't Happen, Why Is Spanberger Blocking Feds From Polling Places?
A Book About the Threats to the Truth by AI Contains False Content...
Jamie Raskin Continues to Lie About President Trump's Charlottesville Remarks
The U.S. Announces Indictment of Former Cuban Leader Raúl Castro
Did CNN Really Just Get Karen Bass to Admit She's a Failure?
A Bill Maher Guest Argued That China Has 'Freedom' It's Just a Different...
US to Withdraw 5,000 Troops From Europe
When Political Violence Becomes Acceptable, It Becomes Inevitable
Michigan Woman Faces 20 Years After Pleading Guilty to $4.6M Child Modeling Scam
Tipsheet

Court Dismisses Lawsuit That Would Have Forced Catholic Hospitals to Perform Abortions

Court Dismisses Lawsuit That Would Have Forced Catholic Hospitals to Perform Abortions

A federal court has dismissed the case American Civil Liberties Union v. Trinity Health Corporation, which sought to force Catholic hospitals and staff members to perform abortions regardless of their religious beliefs or personal objections to the procedure.

Advertisement

The suit was filed by the ACLU in October of 2015. Trinity Health is one of the largest Catholic hospital systems in the country.

The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division, in its dismissal order in American Civil Liberties Union v. Trinity Health Corporation called the ACLU’s claims of harm from the hospital system’s pro-life position “dubious,” explaining that they haven’t satisfied the legal requirements to demonstrate such harm and therefore bring a lawsuit.

The court additionally found that, for those reasons and others, the lawsuit is not “ripe for review,” meaning that nothing has happened to warrant court action: “Obviously, pregnancy alone is not a ‘particular condition’ that requires the termination of said pregnancy. To find the claim to be ripe for review on the facts pleaded before this Court would be to grant a cause of action to every pregnant woman in the state of Michigan upon the date of conception. Accordingly, the alleged harm has not risen beyond a speculative nature and is not ripe for review.”

A good decision. Conscience rights need to be protected, and Catholic hospitals have a right to not be forced to violate their beliefs.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement