Editors' note: the following column contains vulgar language from a liberal academic that many readers will find offensive.
Dear Dr. Pino:
I would like, if at all possible, for you to inform me of the exact location from which you sent the following email message, dated Tuesday, April 6 2010, at 4:24 p.m that started: "... I f*** your mother..." The disgusting profanity-laced message just gets worse from there.
I am curious because I have been forwarded several such messages from bloggers around the country who (claimed to have) tried to engage you in reasoned dialogue. In each instance, you apparently responded by claiming to have performed sexual acts upon their mothers. Furthermore, you apparently did so by using your Kent State email address, which ends in the suffix "kent.edu." I would like to know whether you are also sending these messages from your office at Kent State University.
Mike S. Adams
I am disappointed by your continued cowardly refusal to answer either your phone or my simple questions. Ten days ago, you sent me a video, which you claimed showed U.S. troops targeting innocent women and children - in other words, intentionally killing civilians. Your sudden interest in the lives of innocent children perplexes me for two reasons:
First, you wrote an article (for the Kent State University newspaper) encouraging children to become suicide bombers for the express purpose of killing Jewish women and children who, of course, are not members of the military. In other words, you believed then that it was permissible to target civilians. Now, you seem to hold a different view.
Second, the prophet Mohammad was married to a six year old and consummated the marriage when she was nine. In other words, Mohammad was a pedophile and child rapist by today's standards. It's tough for me to accept your newfound concern for innocent children when you profess allegiance to a pedophile. Am I correct in asserting that Mohammad was a pedophile? I pointed out his pedophilia in a previous email to you. You did not counter my assertion with facts rebutting Mohammed's status as a sexual deviant. Instead, you asserted that you, too, were a sexual deviant by claiming to engage in the act of sodomy with a member of my family who happens to be a senior citizen.
Can I expect a more measured and relevant response to this email, professor?
Mike S. Adams