Every election, we’re told, is important. Critical, even. But it’s more than the usual hyperbole this time.
Right now, our nation’s on the wrong path. If nothing is done, our next generation will experience not liberty, freedom and prosperity, but crushing debt, higher taxes, and job-killing regulations.
Unlike any generation before us, we face the very real possibility that our grandchildren may be worse off than their grandparents.
But a comprehensive program that we at The Heritage Foundation have developed, “Saving the American Dream,” shows how we can preserve the American Dream.
First, the budget problem must be addressed. Left alone, entitlement programs such as Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid and their unfunded liabilities will cripple the nation.
Reforms to entitlement programs, health insurance, and the federal tax code under Heritage’s plan would balance the budget within 10 years, and keep it balanced -- not with tax hikes, but with serious cuts in government spending.
Next is debt. Currently, the federal debt is 70 percent of the economy and rising. By the early 2020s, debt would amount to 100 percent of GDP.
That’s why each of my three grandchildren has a $200,000 + mortgage -- with no home attached to it. This share of the unfunded liabilities of entitlements will be used to pay for the benefits of my wife and me. It’s morally and financially irresponsible to have debt like this.
The Heritage plan cuts the nation’s debt to 30 percent of GDP by 2035, and puts it on a downward path. This helps to guarantee that future generations will not be drowned by debt, and the interest costs that come with it.
Big government is another problem. The role of the federal government has been expanded vastly in recent years. The Heritage plan calls for a major realignment of the federal government, reducing it to about one about half its currently projected size within 25 years.
Our plan focuses on eliminating the federal government’s micromanagement of our economy that should be dealt with on a state or local level -- or, better yet, by the private sector.
Redundant and wasteful programs are eliminated completely, while other responsibilities are granted to the states with greater flexibility. And those functions that the private sector performs better would be removed from the grasp of planners in Washington.
Burke opposes out-of-state political contributions – unless they help her campaign | Adam Tobias | 376
After film crew shot, Omaha mayor says ride-along decision left to police chief | Deena Winter | 183