Trump’s Texas Deal Dilemma
It’s Not Islamophobia, It’s Islamo-I’m-Sick-of-Hearing-About-It
CNN Proves False Narratives Are a Network Feature; WaPo Upset Photographers It Does...
Bombshell Federal Lawsuit Says Teachers Abused Students for Decades in Small Wisconsin Sch...
What If Those Iranian Bombs Had Nuclear Warheads
Between a Mullah and a Hard Place
Obama's Race-Hustling Eulogy at a Race Hustler's Funeral
The Religious, the Secular and the Truth
Democrats’ Latest Sacrificial Pawns
If Virginia Is for Lovers, There Is No Place for Tyrants
Florida Teens Accused of Plotting to Kill Classmate to Resurrect Sandy Hook Shooter
Farm Labor Company Operator Pleads Guilty to RICO Charge in Worker Exploitation Case
Venezuelan Man Accused of Assaulting Federal Agent, Grabbing Gun During Arrest in Michigan
This Major Insurance Company Agreed to Pay $117M Over Allegedly Overcharging Medicare for...
James Carville Admits He Has 'Trump Derangement Syndrome' — Says He Prays for...
Tipsheet

Supreme Court To Hear Case That Could Undo Charges For J6 Protestors, Trump

Supreme Court To Hear Case That Could Undo Charges For J6 Protestors, Trump
AP Photo/John Minchillo

On Wednesday, the Supreme Court announced its plan to hear an appeal that could potentially upend hundreds of charges stemming from the Jan. 6 Capitol Hill protests, including against former President Trump. 

Advertisement

According to an Associated Press report, the higher court will review a charge of obstruction of an official proceeding brought against more than 300 people. The charge is related to the disruption of Congress' certification of President Joe Biden's 2020 election win.

The federal law known as 1512(c)(2) has been used against the J6 protestors and represents half of Justice Department special counsel Jack Smith's case against Trump.

This is in addition to four similar charges that have been brought against Trump by Smith, who has accused the 45th president of inciting violent riots through social media posts. 

The Supreme Court's decision to review the charges may threaten the start of Trump's trial, which is scheduled for March 4. The justices are reportedly considering whether to rule quickly on the Republican leader's claim that he has immunity and can't be prosecuted for actions taken while acting as president— which a federal judge already has rejected. 

Advertisement

Related:

JANUARY 6

More than 1,200 people have been prosecuted with charges stemming from J6, and according to court records, at least 152 people have already been convicted at trial or pleaded guilty to obstructing an official proceeding. At least 108 of them have been sentenced. 

Defense attorney Kira Anne West, representing several Jan. 6 defendants charged with obstruction of an official proceeding, said the courts would have to "undo a whole bunch of cases" and adjust sentences if the Supreme Court rules in their favor. 

"This is a watershed day," West said. "In our world — defense lawyer world — this is huge."

The Supreme Court will hear arguments in March or April, with a decision expected by early summer.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement