There is no reason to unmask ICE agents beyond giving the Left the ability to dox and harass ICE agents and their families. It's an intimidation tactic that the Left desperately wants to employ in the hopes that they can get ICE agents to stop deporting illegal aliens. Unfortunately, federal law wins, but that doesn't mean the Left won't keep trying.
Minnesota Rep. Leigh Finke, a "trans woman," is the latest Democrat to push his party's bullying agenda.
JUST IN: Transgender MN Rep Leigh Finke, a man pretending to be a woman, introduced legislation to ban ICE agents from wearing masks
— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) March 3, 2026
The goal of this is to put agents in harm’s way and allow leftists to dox them and their families. pic.twitter.com/SZGrWXduO6
They never give up on their agenda.
This has already been ruled on by the courts. Leigh Finke is one delusional dude.
— Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸 (@Bubblebathgirl) March 3, 2026
At the start of February, a court ruled that California cannot order ICE agents to unmask.
Yeah but masks protect your jabbed azz from getting Covid, remember dude!?
— Chef Nazty ☕️ (@ChefNazty) March 3, 2026
That was (D)ifferent.
HE SHOULD TALK ABOUT CONCEALING IDENTITIES 🙄
— Angela Bruzzese (@FaccettaNero) March 3, 2026
The irony is so thick that you could cut it with a knife.
It’s as if Minnesota and Colorado are in cahoots. 👀 pic.twitter.com/LEtyDwQInm
— Hi Kid (@HiKidHey) March 3, 2026
They're all in cahoots.
Man who attempts to conceal his identity (by pretending to be a woman) introduces a law about law enforcement concealing their identity.
— Rose of Sharon Mayer (@RozeRage) March 3, 2026
Oh the irony.
So, so ironic.
We’re literally living in a circus up here complete with clowns like him and Walz. https://t.co/frpkUrZJj5
— Minnesota Lady America First🇺🇸 (@BubbyBlu29353) March 3, 2026
It's really a three-ring circus.
Not to worry, the courts will rule against such legislation. Those who believe this man is a woman will believe anything. https://t.co/E51dRwGqLr
— Heavy Rain (@eepauley) March 3, 2026
The courts will. The supremacy clause is a thing.