As Matt covered, the leading juror of a Grand Jury investigation in Georgia is making the media rounds and expressing her desires that "something" be done to damage President Donald Trump even though she "isn't a lawyer." She cited spending too much of her time on the case as one reason why.
Georgia grand jury foreperson: "I will be sad" if the DA decides against bringing charges against Trump ... I will be frustrated if nothing happens." pic.twitter.com/9RfusUCjUX
— Tom Elliott (@tomselliott) February 22, 2023
Now, even members of the Democratic establishment are raising their eyebrows.
Weird. Does anyone one recall the foreman of a grand jury, particularly in a consequential case, doing a media tour BEFORE any indictments are made?!?
— David Axelrod (@davidaxelrod) February 22, 2023
Like, who IS this woman?? https://t.co/zUkI1QbwOF
Conservatives are again pointing out how the left has hijacked the judicial system to solidify their political power.
The full clip is even worse than the headline. This is the lead juror heavily implying she is rooting for indictments because the process took “too much of my time.” https://t.co/hKWlPoFFHd
— Ben Williamson (@_WilliamsonBen) February 22, 2023
The question now is, how can anyone trust this was a fair process? Or that the indictments the grand jury plans to hand down are legitimate? You can't.
The Georgia grand jury that investigated possible interference in the 2020 election by Donald Trump and his allies recommended indictments against over a dozen people, the jury foreperson said Tuesday — a list she said "might" include the former president.
"There are certainly names that you will recognize, yes. There are names also you might not recognize," Emily Kohrs said in an interview that will air Tuesday on NBC News’ “Nightly News.”
She said the list of recommended indictments is "not a short list."