Men Are Going to Strike Back
Democrats Have Earned All the Bad Things
CA Governor Election 2026: Bianco or Hilton
Same Old, Same Old
The Real Purveyors of Jim Crow
Senior Voters Are Key for a GOP Victory in Midterms
The Deep State’s Inversion Matrix Must Be Seen to Be Defeated
Situational Science and Trans Medicine
Trump Slams Bad Bunny's Horrendous Halftime Show
Federal Judge Sentences Abilene Drug Trafficker to Life for Fentanyl Distribution
The Turning Point Halftime Show Crushed Expectations
Jeffries Calls Citizenship Proof ‘Voter Suppression’ As Majority of Americans Back Voter I...
Four Reasons Why the Washington Post Is Dying
Foreign-Born Ohio Lawmaker Pushes 'Sensitive Locations' Bill to Limit ICE Enforcement
TrumpRx Triggers TDS in Elizabeth Warren
Tipsheet

NYTimes: Supreme Court Slanted Right

I'll be honest with you, I'm not a subscriber of the New York Times (shocking, I know).  But today, while passing a newsstand, the paper's front page caught my eye--a large picture of Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts. 
Advertisement


That's weird
, I thought.  What has Roberts been up to lately to warrant front page coverage?  I'll admit, I was intrigued.  I just had to see what the crazy liberal media was complaining about now.  And, just as expected, it was a whole lotta nothin'.

The Times reports that over the last five years under Roberts, the Supreme Court "not only moved to the right but also became the most conservative [court] in living memory," according to "political science data."

While I can imagine the editorial staff at the New York Times is cringing at the thought of a "conservative court" (whatever the heck that means), Gallup reports that before Obama named Elena Kagan to fill the vacancy left by the liberal Justice John Paul Stevens, the American people prefered a new justice to be conservative (42%) rather than liberal (27%). 

After the Senate approved President Obama's first liberal nominee, Justice Sonia Sotomayor, the American public's confidence in the Court as an institution coincidentally
Advertisement
took a dip, down a full three points over the last year.

The Times warns its liberal readers:
If the Roberts court continues on the course suggested by its first five years, it is likely to allow a greater role for religion in public life, to permit more participation by unions and corporations in elections and to elaborate further on the scope of the Second Amendment’s right to bear arms. Abortion rights are likely to be curtailed, as are affirmative action and protections for people accused of crimes.
Recognizing First and Second Amendment rights? Ugh, it is a world gone mad!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement