CBP and ICE Chiefs Faced Off Against Unhinged Dems...and One Said the Quiet...
Democrat Presidential Hopeful Has Been Telling Some Weird Lies About His Ancestor and...
DOJ Charges Two Men in $120 Million Adult Day Care Fraud Scheme
The Press Gets Unwound by Their Solitary Sources, and the NYT Goes Winter...
Chewing the Fat on the Left's 'Body Positivity' Flip Flop
National Nurses Union Calls for the Abolition of ICE
Delaware Smacked Down for Trying to Enforce Law, Ignoring Injunction
The Clintons Are So Over
Tensions Rise At the White House's New Religious Liberty Commission as One Member...
Mike Johnson Blasts Mamdani's DOH for Creating a ‘Global Oppression’ Group Focused on...
Kentucky Senate Candidate Andy Barr Endorses Pro-Amnesty Book Despite Pledging to Be ‘Amer...
The NYT Report on the Marijuana Epidemic Is a Startling Warning
Democrat Attacks Christians, Calls Muslim Jihad on the West a 'Middle Eastern Version...
Even CNN Knows That Democrats Are on the Wrong Side of the Voter...
Ken Paxton Notches Immigration Win As Premier Community for Illegals Pays Out $68...
Tipsheet

Senate Democrats Block Proposed Halt of Stimulus "Signs to Nowhere"

Republican Senator Judd Gregg (NH) voiced his opposition Wednesday to the "self-congratulatory" signs announcing road construction projects receiving funds from President Obama's $787 billion stimulus package passed earlier this year.  Gregg tried in vain to stop spending taxpayer dollars on these large green-and-white road signs. 
Advertisement


An amendment Gregg introduced today would have ended the use of stimulus dollars to buy these "signs to nowhere," but instead met stiff opposition from Senate Democrats.  Only five Democrats joined the Senate's 40 Republicans in voting for Gregg's amendment.  In a written statement, Gregg lamented,

Considering the questionable effectiveness of the stimulus bill, it is completely unreasonable that signs are being constructed at a price tag of hundreds to thousands of dollars apiece for lawmakers to pat themselves on the back about this legislation.

These signs are simply for political self-interest, and it's high time we stop using stimulus dollars to fund them, and instead use these dollars for their intended purpose of creating economic activity.

Though the actual cost of these signs varies from state to state, Gregg estimates the total cost at anywhere between $6 and $20 million. 

Fox News reports that California Senator Barbara Boxer (D) opposed the amendment, saying

[T]he signs help keep the public informed about federal projects. She argued the amendment was motivated by frustration on the part of Republicans who opposed the stimulus and now see that it's working. Only three Republican senators voted for the stimulus bill.

'They predicted gloom and doom. And let me tell you what's happening in this great nation of ours. We have a long way to go to get jobs up and running, there's no question about it. But the stimulus has already saved or created a million jobs,' she said.

'So now I think the issue here is a frustration with the fact that we won that vote and we got that done and those jobs are being created as we speak,' she said. 'Slowly, but surely, we're being lifted out of the darkness.'

Advertisement

Following the failed vote, Gregg was "flabbergasted."

'I just find it absurd that we're putting up all these signs all over the country with taxpayer money telling taxpayers we're spending their money,' he told FOX News. 'Most taxpayers can figure that out. We don't have to put up a sign and tell them we're spending their money.'

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement