Italy Executes Mass Arrests of Charity Workers Who Funneled Money to Jihadist Trash
CBS News Investigated Somali Daycare Centers After a YouTuber's Video Went Viral. Here's...
FBI Says It Thwarted a Planned ISIS-Style Terror Plot Ahead of New Year's...
Pseudo-Recessions
A Judge, a Technicality, and the Fight Over What We Feed Our Kids
Judicial Lessons From the Hannah Dugan Verdict
Wisconsin Gov. Evers Laments Healthcare Costs While Suing to Protect ‘Gender-Affirming’ Ca...
The Heckler Awards, Part 4 – The Continued Celebration of the Bottom of...
Did a Politico Writer Just Incite Violence Against Journalists Investigating Minnesota's F...
Peace Through Strength: US Military Surpasses Recruitment Goals Under Trump-Era Policies
Scott Jennings Blasts California’s Wealth Tax As Cover-Up for the States $70B Fraud...
Mamdani to Be Inaugurated in Subway Station Built by Entrepreneurs and the Free...
Jessica Tarlov Shocked a 'Kid' Was Able to Expose $100 Million in Fraud...
Scott Jennings Goes Off on CNN Panelist Over Her Israel-Gaza Remarks, Comparing Israel...
Another Leftist Judge Is Blocking Trump's Deportations
Tipsheet

Yeah, About Those Contempt Hearings Boasberg Was Mulling for Trump Officials...

Diego M. Radzinschi/ALM via AP

Judge James Boasberg got gutted last night: the Supreme Court ruled that the Trump administration can deport illegal aliens, they can invoke the Alien Enemies Act, and there’s nothing he can do to stop it. The little judge got owned, but Boasberg was mulling contempt hearings for Trump officials over the deportation flights, which is absurd. His rulings were vacated, but it seems he is hell-bent on holding this administration in contempt and beyond (via WaPo):

Advertisement

At an emergency hearing, Boasberg temporarily blocked the administration from deporting alleged gang members to El Salvador without due process. Trump and his allies soon began calling for the judge’s impeachment. Online influencers, Republican lawmakers and the White House spokeswoman joined the attacks, drawing warnings from constitutional scholars about the need to respect the independence of the legal system.

Boasberg’s next decision may be one of his most fraught: whether to begin proceedings to potentially hold Trump officials in contempt for defying one of his orders in the deportation case. 

[…] 

In court … the judge grilled a Justice Department lawyer for answers, his eyebrows raised and eyes wide as he suggested government officials had acted in “bad faith” and intentionally rushed to load migrants onto planes and out of the country before he could order them to stop. 

“You’re telling me you had no knowledge whatsoever that the planes were in the air or shortly would be in the air,” Boasberg said. 

[…] 

In a subsequent hearing, the judge demanded that the government explain why it had nevertheless deported more than 130 Venezuelans to a prison in El Salvador that day. He sounded incredulous after a Justice Department lawyer said that the planes were already out of U.S. airspace and asserted that the judge’s oral order to turn the planes around would have had force only if he put it in writing.

“A heck of a stretch,” Boasberg said.

At a tense hearing … to determine whether to open contempt proceedings against Trump officials, Boasberg calmly pressed the government’s lawyer, who repeatedly struggled to respond, saying he did not have the information the judge was seeking. 

“Who made the decision either not to tell the pilots anything or to tell them to keep going?” the judge asked. 

“Your honor, I don’t know that,” Deputy Assistant Attorney General Drew Ensign said. 

“You’re standing here telling me you have no idea who made the decision not to bring the planes back,” Boasberg said, shaking his head from a high-backed black chair beneath a large U.S. District Court seal.

Advertisement

Related:

CONSERVATISM

The core of his argument has been smashed into dust, but one can still be held in contempt of rulings on appeal. The Federalist’s Margot Cleveland had more: 

Congress must move to rein in these judges, either by impeachment or by dissolving the district courts that are knowingly activist. These judges could then submit their rulings to The New York Times or other liberal newspapers—it would not be a stretch from what they would’ve written in their unlawful rulings.

Advertisement

***

This man is out of control:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos