Did The New York Times Criticize 'Epic Fury' Using the Man Investigated for...
Gavin Newsom Is Many Things. 'Pro-Family' Is Not One of Them.
Rep. Tom Tiffany Introduces Legislation to End Birthright Citizenship Loophole Being Explo...
Oregon Senate Committee Guts Gun Control Bill
President Trump Blasts Tucker Carlson: 'He’s Not MAGA'
GOP Rep Defends American Foreign Policy, Explains Why Operation Epic Fury Was Inevitable
Senator Tim Sheehy Helps to Forcibly Remove Crazed Protester During Senate Hearing
Tony Gonzales Suspends Campaign After Finally Admitting to the Affair He Denied for...
State Department Says That U.S., Venezuela Have Re-Established Diplomatic Relations
Federal Court Sentences Illegal Alien to Prison for $343K SNAP Benefits Fraud
CENTCOM: U.S. Has Destroyed More Than 30 Iranian Ships
NY AG Letitia James Sues Video Game Maker Over Loot Boxes
New Jersey Man Pleads Guilty in $600M Nationwide Catalytic Converter Theft Ring
U.S. House Rejects Resolution to Stop Strikes on Iran
Juror Bribery Plot in Feeding Our Future Fraud Trial Leads to 57-Month Sentence
Tipsheet

Voter Reactions to the ABC News Debate Were Not Good...for Kamala

Voter Reactions to the ABC News Debate Were Not Good...for Kamala
AP Photo/Alex Brandon

Donald Trump didn’t clinch a decisive win last night, though he had his chances. That’s what’s so frustrating. Kamala Harris wasn’t good, but also not a total disaster like Joe Biden was in June. She got under Trump’s skin, with the former president taking the bait on rally size and the 2020 election. Trump sounded and looked flustered over these topics, plus January 6 and the weaponization of the Justice Department. The more he spoke less about policy, the more comfortable Kamala became—that’s not good. There were chances to land a haymaker to knock her out, and Trump failed. Instead of demoralizing Democrats, we will now hear about how Kamala shifted the race. 

Advertisement

The ABC News debate was a disaster from a moderator standpoint, with David Muir and Linsey Davis exhibiting gross bias, also laying traps for Trump like the question about Kamala Harris' racial identity. Trump was facing Harris, Muir, and Davis last night. If you want to say it was a draw, that’s fair, but the fact Trump couldn’t bury Harris on policy is what irks me. It was there. Yet, as I noted earlier this morning, it might not matter. The CNN snap poll on who won showed Harris running away with it. Yet, on the crucial issue of the economy, she lost ground. It was already at a paltry 37 percent; it dropped to 35. 

We had voters saying how Trump, by default essentially, is more trusted on immigration. ABC News even admitted post-debate that Harris didn’t answer the questions. One voter in a CNN focus group said that when it comes down to brass tacks, her life was better under Trump—this was an undecided voter:

Advertisement

Related:

2024 ELECTION

This poll is the one the media will focus on:

And yet:

We’re in Rorschach territory on this one: those who thought Kamala dominated will see that while other voters will think Trump bested her. Let’s revisit this once the latest wave of polls are released. No, I don’t think Trump lost, but he didn’t win either.

Advertisement

Harris’ campaign wants a second debate, though Trump was left in the spin room to answer that question since the Harris camp absconded to a fundraiser instead.

Regardless, because Harris “won” the CNN debate poll, despite losing ground on handling the economy, expect a lot of funny takes from the media on how Harris made Trump meet his Waterloo when that's not the case. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement