'Whack Job': Here's Where Trump's Would-Be Assassin Gave Everyone the Creeps
Oh, Look, a Video of a Cat Being Grilled Like Bobby Flay in...
It's Articles Like This That Fuel Stolen Election Narratives
Yes, Dems Are to Blame for the Assassination Attempts on Trump
Socialized Medicine: The Consequences
Trump's Golf Partner Speaks Out After Second Assassination Attempt
This U.S. City Is Having Serious Issues With Animal Sacrifices, Torture
Carville Has a Sketchy Solution for How Harris Can Appear 'Good on Her...
'Free Speech Victory': Breton Resigns From European Commission Post
'Weaponization of Government': Kennedy Now Under Investigation Over Something That Happene...
Lessons From the Newsroom: How Media Rhetoric Fuels Division and What We...
Remember That 'Migrant Influencer' Who Urged Illegals to Squat in Americans' Homes? Well.....
DeSantis Explains Why Florida Will Conduct Its Own Investigation Into the Trump Assassinat...
Endless: 'Migrant' Crime Spree Continues Across America
Senator J.D. Vance Is the Capstone for the MAGA Legacy
Tipsheet

Voter Reactions to the ABC News Debate Were Not Good...for Kamala

AP Photo/Alex Brandon

Donald Trump didn’t clinch a decisive win last night, though he had his chances. That’s what’s so frustrating. Kamala Harris wasn’t good, but also not a total disaster like Joe Biden was in June. She got under Trump’s skin, with the former president taking the bait on rally size and the 2020 election. Trump sounded and looked flustered over these topics, plus January 6 and the weaponization of the Justice Department. The more he spoke less about policy, the more comfortable Kamala became—that’s not good. There were chances to land a haymaker to knock her out, and Trump failed. Instead of demoralizing Democrats, we will now hear about how Kamala shifted the race. 

Advertisement

The ABC News debate was a disaster from a moderator standpoint, with David Muir and Linsey Davis exhibiting gross bias, also laying traps for Trump like the question about Kamala Harris' racial identity. Trump was facing Harris, Muir, and Davis last night. If you want to say it was a draw, that’s fair, but the fact Trump couldn’t bury Harris on policy is what irks me. It was there. Yet, as I noted earlier this morning, it might not matter. The CNN snap poll on who won showed Harris running away with it. Yet, on the crucial issue of the economy, she lost ground. It was already at a paltry 37 percent; it dropped to 35. 

We had voters saying how Trump, by default essentially, is more trusted on immigration. ABC News even admitted post-debate that Harris didn’t answer the questions. One voter in a CNN focus group said that when it comes down to brass tacks, her life was better under Trump—this was an undecided voter:

Advertisement

This poll is the one the media will focus on:

And yet:

We’re in Rorschach territory on this one: those who thought Kamala dominated will see that while other voters will think Trump bested her. Let’s revisit this once the latest wave of polls are released. No, I don’t think Trump lost, but he didn’t win either.

Advertisement

Harris’ campaign wants a second debate, though Trump was left in the spin room to answer that question since the Harris camp absconded to a fundraiser instead.

Regardless, because Harris “won” the CNN debate poll, despite losing ground on handling the economy, expect a lot of funny takes from the media on how Harris made Trump meet his Waterloo when that's not the case. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement