Reason Editor Penned a Brutal Takedown of Darializa Avila Chevalier, the Most Insane...
Obama's Top Aide Trotted Out This Gentle Reminder to Dems. They Won't Like...
Judge Rules on Charlie Kirk Assassin's Request to Remove Death Penalty
People Noticed Something Odd About Zohran Mamdani's Ashura Celebration
Nicolle Wallace Thinks the Statue of Liberty Trumps Immigration Law
'I Didn't Speak Up Because It Was Easy.' WI Volleyball Player Works to...
Gavin Newsom Just Called For a National Billionaire Tax
A Small Group of Democrats Is Saying No to the Socialist Takeover
Chicago Man Charged with Obstructing Justice in Foiled White House UFC Attack Plot
Fugitive in Massive Child Food Fraud Case Captured Overseas
World Cup Fans Are Touring America and Loving Every Minute of It
Trump Declares Holy War on Communism in Latest Speech
U.S. Secret Service Seized 35 Illegal Skimmers, Stopped $36M in Possible Fraud in...
Illegal Alien Sentenced to 8 Years for $38 Million Payroll Tax Fraud
United States Announces Strikes Against Iran Moments After Trump Warning
Tipsheet

We Have More Bad News About Electric Cars

We Have More Bad News About Electric Cars
AP Photo/Rich Pedroncelli

The future is electric. Does anyone remember hearing that nonsense from the Green Warriors concerning the mad dash to make every vehicle electric? It never ceases to amaze me how so many people fell for this con job. This scheme was a Robert Redford-Paul Newman in The Sting-type of a long con, and we all got taken. The main selling point—that it helps take us off our dependence on fossil fuels—is a myth.  

Advertisement

You need coal plants to charge your car. Second, these electric vehicles are laughably unreliable in inclement weather. You need to upgrade your power grid at your house to accommodate the charging station, all of which adds tens of thousands to your clean energy purchase.  

It was an anti-profit venture for the carmakers, though they used it as an excuse to play hardball with autoworker unions regarding their demands last year when new contracts were due. In the end, electric cars might be worse for the environment, paving the way for an embarrassing policy trip-up by the Biden White House, which has pushed EV mandates (via NY Post): 

Electric vehicles release more toxic particles into the atmosphere and are worse for the environment than their gas-powered counterparts, according to a resurfaced study. 

The study, published by emissions data firm Emission Analytics, was released in 2022 but has attracted a wave of attention this week after being cited in a Wall Street Journal op-ed Sunday. 

It found that brakes and tires on EVs release 1,850 times more particle pollution compared to modern tailpipes, which have “efficient” exhaust filters, bringing gas-powered vehicles’ emissions to new lows. 

Today, most vehicle-related pollution comes from tire wear. 

[…] 

Because EVs are on average 30% heavier, brakes and tires on the battery-powered cars wear out faster than on standard cars. 

Emission Analytics found that tire wear emissions on half a metric tonne of battery weight in an EV are more than 400 times as great as direct exhaust particulate emissions. 

[…] 

The study throws doubt on the practicality of the Biden administration’s EV mandates, which tout electric cars as “zero-emissions vehicles” in a quest to force two-thirds of new cars in America to be all-electric by the year 2032. 

California lawmakers have similarly referred to EVs as producing “zero emissions” because they don’t have tailpipes, per the Journal, which added that the label is “deceptive.” 

Electric cars still use tires made from petroleum that create particle pollution as they wear. 

Advertisement

Related:

GREEN ENERGY

So, we can add another chapter to the ever-growing saga of the Green New Scam. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement