Oh, If This Is What Schumer Wanted to Do, Republicans Should Nuke the...
Some Democrats Are Admitting They Lied Before The Election
Slap Down The Slander
Missouri Official Makes The Right Move on Gun Control Proposal
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 242: What the Old Testament Says About Fearing...
With an Honest Press, Democrats Wouldn't Have Been Shocked at the Election...
Social Media Mocks Biden After He Gets Back-Row Spot In Photo With Xi...
Trump Attends UFC Fight With High-Profile Crew
What Does Trump’s Election Mean for Evangelical Christians?
MSNBC Guest Who Went After Pete Hegseth Facing Backlash From All Sides
How Elon Musk’s Government Efficacy Will Drive Out the Biden-Harris Admin’s Woke Agenda
Trump Taps Liberty Energy CEO Chris Wright for Department of Energy
Eric Adams Dropped Truth Bombs On The View
We Need to Stop This From Happening to Our Children
Trump Is Suing the Mainstream Media-- and They Ought to Be Afraid
Tipsheet

Michigan Judge Strikes Down 1931 Abortion Ban

AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana

On Monday, a judge blocked enforcement of a 1931 abortion ban in Michigan just hours after the state Appeals Court ruled that county prosecutors could enforce the pre-Roe law. 

Advertisement

Oakland County Judge Jacob Cunningham stepped in and issued the order at the request of pro-abortion Gov. Gretchen Whitmer (D), NBC News reported. He issued a restraining order against prosecutors in counties with abortion providers and scheduled a hearing for Wednesday.

“The legal fight in Michigan continues and this temporary restraining order ensures prosecutors cannot target women or providers in the short term,” said Attorney General Dana Nessel, a pro-abortion Democrat.

On Monday, as Townhall covered, the Michigan Court of Appeals’ ruling allowed county prosecutors to enforce the 1931 law. The law allows prosecutors to file criminal charges against those who provide abortions.

Previously, a Michigan judge issued an injunction on the law just weeks before the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey. The Court of Appeals’ ruling said the injunction covered state officials only.

Townhall covered last month how Whitmer signed a $76 million budget bill but vetoed funds and tax credits for pro-life pregnancy centers and adoption programming that would have equaled less than $20 million, less than 0.03 percent of the entire budget.

“I am using my veto pen to reject line items that harm women's health care. These line items would create a gag rule preventing reproductive health-service providers from even mentioning abortion and otherwise make it harder for women to get the health care they need. Any efforts to undermine a woman's ability to make her own medical decisions with her trusted health-care provider will earn my disapproval. Women and doctors should be making health care decisions — not politicians,” Whitmer’s line-item veto read.

Advertisement

One of the items Whitmer vetoed in her budget signing included $1 million for community colleges to create facilities to provide services for pregnant and parenting students. This would have included housing, child care, flexible academic scheduling, and education about responsible parenting.

“We have the largest budget in history, and we want to throw a bone to adoptive parents, and she's vetoing that?” Genevieve Marnon, the legislative director for Michigan Right to Life, told Bridge Michigan. “Wow, she's for women alright.”

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement