Bye-Bye, Robert Mueller
California Sheriff Shocks State After Seizing 650k Ballots
Hakeem Jeffries Claims Trump Is Going to Get 'Somebody Killed' After He Criticized...
Democrats Have Another Genius Idea for Winning Back Power
NRSC Launches Vegan-Mocking Merch That the Talarico Campaign Is Going to Find Hard...
Albany Mayor's Answer on Fixing City's Debt Problem Is a Word Salad Mess
Two-Fifths of American Women Want to Do What?
President Trump Deploys ICE to Help Clean Up the Airport Mess Democrats Have...
Socialism for the Rest of Us
Sen. Brian Schatz Is 'Serene' Amid Shutdown, but Not When It Comes to...
The Democrats' Plan for 2028 Is a Magical Misery Tour
From TSA Lines to the Ballot Box: Shutdown Could Haunt Democrats As GOP...
So About That 'Forever War'
Op-Ed Derides Campus Carry, Misses Key Point
Indivisible 'No Kings' Training Call: Anti-Trump Group Not Doing Violence ‘At This Point’...
Tipsheet

How WaPo Tried to Discredit Journalists Behind the Twitter Files With Just One Word

How WaPo Tried to Discredit Journalists Behind the Twitter Files With Just One Word
Manuel Balce Ceneta

The Washington Post took a subtle dig at independent journalists Matt Taibbi and Bari Weis for their work on the Twitter Files, exposing internal documents at the social media giant that have showed some of the most controversial decisions at the company prior to Elon Musk’s takeover.

Advertisement

In a report published Monday evening about the site’s Trust & Safety Council getting dissolved, WaPo labeled Taibbi and Weiss as “conservative journalists.”

"As head of trust and safety at Twitter, Roth was involved in many of the platform’s decisions about what posts to remove and what accounts to suspend. His communications with other Twitter officials have been posted in recent days as part of what Musk calls the Twitter Files, a series of tweets by conservative journalists Matt Taibbi and Bari Weiss," the Post story initially stated. 

Taibbi, a Substack writer, once covered politics for Rolling Stone and has described himself as “run-of-the-mill, old-school ACLU liberal.” Weiss, meanwhile, previously served as the opinion page editor at The New York Times. Neither is considered conservative, but as critics pointed out, that label has become a “smear” to discredit them and the work they’re doing. 

 

Advertisement

The Post eventually stealth edited the label after Fox News Digital asked about it, but no editor's note was issued indicating a correction took place. 

"That is hilarious," Taibbi told Fox about the Post's report. "Anyone who steps out of line in any way is labeled conservative or pro-Trump now. It's automatic and predictable."

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement