How About a Dignity Act for Actual Americans?
Why Everyone Tracking Oil Tanker Traffic Is Pleased to See Where They're Heading
The Inevitable Has Happened for Eric Swalwell
The Locust Left Shows You Who Not to Vote for: A Handy Guide
'Parents Need to Be Aware': High-Profile Transgender Cases Shaping America's Battle Over P...
NATO: No Action, Talk Only
My Generation Cannot Sustain the America Democrats Are Creating
The Insulting DIGNITY Act
Trust Iran? Why?
Critical Race Theory: On the Ropes but Lingering
Goodbye NATO, Hello America First
Funded Silence: Congress Shields Itself While Lecturing Everyone Else
Man Accused of Smuggling 655 Illegal Aliens Sentenced to 8 Years
This New Poll on Iran Is Eye-Opening
Strait of Hormuz Blockade to Begin on Monday at 10 A.M ET
Tipsheet

How WaPo Tried to Discredit Journalists Behind the Twitter Files With Just One Word

How WaPo Tried to Discredit Journalists Behind the Twitter Files With Just One Word
Manuel Balce Ceneta

The Washington Post took a subtle dig at independent journalists Matt Taibbi and Bari Weis for their work on the Twitter Files, exposing internal documents at the social media giant that have showed some of the most controversial decisions at the company prior to Elon Musk’s takeover.

Advertisement

In a report published Monday evening about the site’s Trust & Safety Council getting dissolved, WaPo labeled Taibbi and Weiss as “conservative journalists.”

"As head of trust and safety at Twitter, Roth was involved in many of the platform’s decisions about what posts to remove and what accounts to suspend. His communications with other Twitter officials have been posted in recent days as part of what Musk calls the Twitter Files, a series of tweets by conservative journalists Matt Taibbi and Bari Weiss," the Post story initially stated. 

Taibbi, a Substack writer, once covered politics for Rolling Stone and has described himself as “run-of-the-mill, old-school ACLU liberal.” Weiss, meanwhile, previously served as the opinion page editor at The New York Times. Neither is considered conservative, but as critics pointed out, that label has become a “smear” to discredit them and the work they’re doing. 

 

Advertisement

The Post eventually stealth edited the label after Fox News Digital asked about it, but no editor's note was issued indicating a correction took place. 

"That is hilarious," Taibbi told Fox about the Post's report. "Anyone who steps out of line in any way is labeled conservative or pro-Trump now. It's automatic and predictable."

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement