Democrats Confirmed Once Again This Week How Racist They Are
CNN's Jake Tapper Really Doesn't Like Hunter Biden
Jon Ossoff Spends A LOT of Money on This Item...and He Puts Some...
DSA Assault on Prisons Is Rooted in Third Worldist Lust for Barbarism
New St. Louis DEA Leader Credits WH, Interagency Cooperation for Falling Fentanyl Overdose...
His Dishonor
The One Democrat Who's Getting Tough Questions From CNN
Ukrainian War Remakes War
The Democratic Socialists of America vs. the United States of America
Broad Tariffs on Semiconductors Risk Economic Harm and American Security
Despite a Decade of Controversy, the Semiquincentennial Pool Party Was a Blast
A President Who Chose a Higher Standard Than the Law Required
Echoes of the Roman Conquest of Jerusalem in Today’s Islamic Conquest of the...
The Mullahs Have Dropped the Mask—The Gulf Must Unite to End Tehran’s Reign...
NYPD: Suspect Screamed 'Allahu Akbar' During Upper West Side Stabbings
Tipsheet

How WaPo Tried to Discredit Journalists Behind the Twitter Files With Just One Word

How WaPo Tried to Discredit Journalists Behind the Twitter Files With Just One Word
Manuel Balce Ceneta

The Washington Post took a subtle dig at independent journalists Matt Taibbi and Bari Weis for their work on the Twitter Files, exposing internal documents at the social media giant that have showed some of the most controversial decisions at the company prior to Elon Musk’s takeover.

Advertisement

In a report published Monday evening about the site’s Trust & Safety Council getting dissolved, WaPo labeled Taibbi and Weiss as “conservative journalists.”

"As head of trust and safety at Twitter, Roth was involved in many of the platform’s decisions about what posts to remove and what accounts to suspend. His communications with other Twitter officials have been posted in recent days as part of what Musk calls the Twitter Files, a series of tweets by conservative journalists Matt Taibbi and Bari Weiss," the Post story initially stated. 

Taibbi, a Substack writer, once covered politics for Rolling Stone and has described himself as “run-of-the-mill, old-school ACLU liberal.” Weiss, meanwhile, previously served as the opinion page editor at The New York Times. Neither is considered conservative, but as critics pointed out, that label has become a “smear” to discredit them and the work they’re doing. 

 

Advertisement

The Post eventually stealth edited the label after Fox News Digital asked about it, but no editor's note was issued indicating a correction took place. 

"That is hilarious," Taibbi told Fox about the Post's report. "Anyone who steps out of line in any way is labeled conservative or pro-Trump now. It's automatic and predictable."

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement