There's a Major Update on the Power of Local Law Enforcement and Deportations
Trump Turns the Microphone Over to Hurricane Helene Victims
Congress Launches New Investigations Into Debanking
Yes, Debanking Is Real
RINO Thom Tillis Plans to Sink Pete Hegseth’s Confirmation
Wait, That's How Long LA Knew About Their Shoddy Water Systems?
Democrats Are Making Things Worse for Themselves
No, We Don't Need to Extend the Presidency to Three Terms for Trump
Thomas Massie Introduces Measure That Would Be a Game Changer for Gun Rights
Boohoo: John Brennan Whines and Lies About Losing His Security Clearance
DeSantis Shuts Down Reporter Who Criticizes Trump’s Immigration Policies
Trump DOJ Dismisses Case Against Doctor Who Exposed 'Trans' Surgeries at Texas Children's...
Do Americans Support Limits on Abortion? Here's What a New Poll Shows
Remember 'Mostly Peaceful Protests'? Check Out the Media's New Narrative for Covering Anti...
Trump Just Revoked Fauci’s Security Detail
Tipsheet

How WaPo Tried to Discredit Journalists Behind the Twitter Files With Just One Word

Manuel Balce Ceneta

The Washington Post took a subtle dig at independent journalists Matt Taibbi and Bari Weis for their work on the Twitter Files, exposing internal documents at the social media giant that have showed some of the most controversial decisions at the company prior to Elon Musk’s takeover.

Advertisement

In a report published Monday evening about the site’s Trust & Safety Council getting dissolved, WaPo labeled Taibbi and Weiss as “conservative journalists.”

"As head of trust and safety at Twitter, Roth was involved in many of the platform’s decisions about what posts to remove and what accounts to suspend. His communications with other Twitter officials have been posted in recent days as part of what Musk calls the Twitter Files, a series of tweets by conservative journalists Matt Taibbi and Bari Weiss," the Post story initially stated. 

Taibbi, a Substack writer, once covered politics for Rolling Stone and has described himself as “run-of-the-mill, old-school ACLU liberal.” Weiss, meanwhile, previously served as the opinion page editor at The New York Times. Neither is considered conservative, but as critics pointed out, that label has become a “smear” to discredit them and the work they’re doing. 

 

Advertisement

The Post eventually stealth edited the label after Fox News Digital asked about it, but no editor's note was issued indicating a correction took place. 

"That is hilarious," Taibbi told Fox about the Post's report. "Anyone who steps out of line in any way is labeled conservative or pro-Trump now. It's automatic and predictable."

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement