They Tried to Kill Trump. Again.
Democrats Have a Massive Graham Platner Problem
Axios Delivers a ‘Scoop’ With No Information; ABC News Struggles With the Term...
Cole Allen's Lawyer Makes a Bid for Release. Here It Is.
Democrats Are Back to Arguing Bathroom Bills and Immigration Enforcement Will Literally Ki...
Salem Media Names Townhall Editor Larry O’Connor As New National Morning Host
Rep. Wesley Hunt Shuts Down Question on the Declining Number of Black Republicans...
Here's How Justice Thomas Would Have Taken the SCOTUS Voting Rights Act Decision...
This Dem Senator Says the Iranian Regime's 'Death to America' Chants Are Just...
The 75-Day Partial Government Shutdown Is Over As House Passes DHS Funding Bill
Florida Governor Ron DeSantis Levels Hakeem Jeffries' 'Maximum Warfare' Comment With Hilar...
Biden-Appointed Judge Orders Release of Illegal Alien Wanted for Murder in Dominican Repub...
Wait, Did an Illegal Alien Make a Meth Lab in This Michigan College...
Detroit Man to Stand Trial for Allegedly Stealing 12 Identities to Pocket $400K...
Ohio Mother and Daughter Allegedly Abused Government Jobs to Steal Nearly $2 Million...
Tipsheet

Fox Anchor: ‘Comey’s Revenge Is a Gun Without Powder’

Fox Anchor: ‘Comey’s Revenge Is a Gun Without Powder’

Fox News Anchor Gregg Jarrett appeared on “Tucker Carlson Tonight” to explain why if then-FBI Direct James Comey believed his memo detailing the ways in which he believed President Trump acted improperly to influence an investigation would be a smoking gun it was one without powder.  

Advertisement

If Comey believed the memo would incriminate Trump, he “put himself in a legal box,” Jarrett told Carlson.

“Under law Comey is required to notify his superiors at the Department of Justice if anybody including the president attempts to obstruct justice. It is a crime for Comey to fail to do so,” he explained. “So the question is, did he notify DOJ? There’s no evidence that he did. It’s more likely   … that Comey will say it was an uncomfortable, disconcerting conversation but it didn’t rise to the level of the specific intent required by obstruction of justice.”

If that’s the case, and he says so when he testifies, Trump is cleared. If he says he believed it was obstruction and didn’t report it, “he’s looking at charges criminally and time behind prison,” Jarrett said.

“That is fascinating,” Carlson replied. 

Jarrett also explained his reasoning further in an op-ed he wrote earlier this week on Fox News. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos