GOP Rep Teased More Debauchery Involving Eric Swalwell Was Coming Before He Resigned
It’s Hard Not to Laugh at the Downfall of Eric Swalwell
Big Beautiful Tax Returns Are Keeping Consumers Afloat
Kash Patel and Sen. David McCormick Team Up to Fight Fentanyl in Pennsylvania
Major US Companies Still Offer to Cover Trans Drugs, Surgeries to Minors Despite...
Democrats Again Attack Religion
Revolution for Thee but Not for Me
The App Store Accountability Act Gets the Problem—and the Policy—Wrong
The Dialysis Industry Is Putting Profits Over Patients
Us and Them
Ted Cruz Is Right to Put the FTC Back Under the Microscope
Putin's War: A Catastrophic Miscalculation That Weakened Russia and Strengthened the West
Zoomers Put Their Own Stamp on Tech-Enabled Rudeness
Exclusive: Texas GOP Official Says Anti-Trump Candidate Tried to Conceal Background of Dem...
California Democrats Just Revealed Their New Scheme to Protect Fraudsters
Tipsheet

Fox Anchor: ‘Comey’s Revenge Is a Gun Without Powder’

Fox Anchor: ‘Comey’s Revenge Is a Gun Without Powder’

Fox News Anchor Gregg Jarrett appeared on “Tucker Carlson Tonight” to explain why if then-FBI Direct James Comey believed his memo detailing the ways in which he believed President Trump acted improperly to influence an investigation would be a smoking gun it was one without powder.  

Advertisement

If Comey believed the memo would incriminate Trump, he “put himself in a legal box,” Jarrett told Carlson.

“Under law Comey is required to notify his superiors at the Department of Justice if anybody including the president attempts to obstruct justice. It is a crime for Comey to fail to do so,” he explained. “So the question is, did he notify DOJ? There’s no evidence that he did. It’s more likely   … that Comey will say it was an uncomfortable, disconcerting conversation but it didn’t rise to the level of the specific intent required by obstruction of justice.”

If that’s the case, and he says so when he testifies, Trump is cleared. If he says he believed it was obstruction and didn’t report it, “he’s looking at charges criminally and time behind prison,” Jarrett said.

“That is fascinating,” Carlson replied. 

Jarrett also explained his reasoning further in an op-ed he wrote earlier this week on Fox News. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement