Politico's Headline About the World Cup Is Why the Media Is Mocked Endlessly
Postmaster General to States Being Uppity About Voter Roll Disclosure: No Mail-in Ballots...
Hakeem Jeffries Got Cooked by This CNBC Host...and It Was Beautiful to Watch
C-SPAN Caller Blasts Dems for Opposing the SAVE America Act
Wow, a View Co-Host Actually Had a Sensible Take on the NY Socialist...
MS Now Guest Suffered a Total Meltdown Over the Supreme Court's Migrant Ruling
What's Up With All These Socialists Winning Elections?
Greg Steube Proposes New House Rule That Would Bar New York's Socialists From...
Founder of Lawn Service Non-Profit Hopes to Mark America's 250th by Cutting White...
President Trump Declares War on the Communists: 'The Game Is On'
The Next Stage of Iran’s War
Trans Desperation on Display
French Ban on Iranian Opposition Rally Reveals the Movement’s Remarkable Capacity to Organ...
Due Process Doesn't Mean Legal Advice
The Housing Bill Could Solve the Affordability Crisis, but Not in the Way...
Tipsheet

BREAKING: Senate Commitee Passes Resolution Approving Military Action in Syria

BREAKING: Senate Commitee Passes Resolution Approving Military Action in Syria
The Senate Foreign Relations Committee has passed a resolution approving military force in Syria by a 10-7 vote. The resolution will now go to the full Senate for a vote next week. Republicans McCain, Corker and Flake voted for the resolution. Democratic Senator Ed Markey voted present.
Advertisement


The resolution states military action will not include boots on the ground and has a 90-day time frame.

UPDATE: John McCain said early Wednesday that he could not support the resolution, but ended up voting for it anyway. He also played poker on his iPhone yesterday during a hearing on Syria.

UPDATE II:
McCain voted yes after inserting an amendment into the resolution saying the goal of military action is to shift the momentum on the battlefield. Essentially, the amendment declares the United States has taken the side against the Assad regime in the Syrian civil war. This is opposite of President Obama's stance, which isn't regime change but very limited military strikes in order to "send a message."

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos