You Won’t Believe Who Just Cheered Iran’s Islamic Revolution
OpenAI Fires Executive Who Warned About 'Adult Mode'
Axios Is Having a Tough Go of Things This Week, and Media Are...
In Defense of Female Inmates
Canada's MAiD Program Is About to Get Even More Horrifying
Backlash Grows Over the University of Notre Dame's Appointment of Pro-Abortion Professor
Megyn Kelly’s Moral Blind Spot: Refusing to Condemn Candace Owens
Democrat Ohio Senate Hopeful Sherrod Brown Supports an AG Candidate Who Vowed to...
California Campaign Adviser Sentenced to 48 Months in PRC Agent Case
19 New York City Residents Reportedly Freeze to Death After Mamdani Changes Homeless...
Colorado Woman Allegedly Billed $400K to Medicaid for Family’s Phantom Medical Rides
Philadelphia Men Allegedly Used ChatGPT to Scam Minnesota Out of $3.5M
Queens Duo Charged in Alleged Decade-Long $120 Million Medicare Scam
White House Blasts Washington Post Over ‘Breaking’ Story Trump Announced Last Year
‘Customer Has Spoken’: Ford Motor Company Faces $11 Billion Hit on EV Investments
Tipsheet

Liberal Attacks on the Supreme Court Just Reached New Levels

AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite

New York Times editorial board member Mara Gay claimed the far-right is now being represented by the Supreme Court as Senate Democrats try to come up with ways to "reign in" the supposed "rouge" court because they have issued rulings they do not like.  

Advertisement

"In this moment in American history the far-right in the country, which includes several members of the Supreme Court at this point, is far less interested I believe, unfortunately, in precedent and in democratic institutions and far more interested in raw power," Gay warned.

"And I think what’s interesting about this op-ed to me is it’s straight out of the right-wing playbook at this point," she continued. "Throw out an extreme idea that is anathema to everything that any American who has been to a high school social studies class would recognize as the importance of the balance and checks of power, and then get Americans used to it so by the time you’ve decided that Congress, despite Section 3 of the Constitution, has absolutely no role in altering or regulating the court, then Americans will accept that, as though it was true all along."

The Wall Street Journal recently interviewed Justice Samuel Alito, who said the recent attacks against the Court have reached preposterous proportions:

Advertisement

Related:

SUPREME COURT

'I marvel at all the nonsense that has been written about me in the last year,' Justice Samuel Alito says during an early July interview at the Journal’s New York offices. In the face of a political onslaught, he observes, 'the traditional idea about how judges and justices should behave is they should be mute' and leave it to others, especially 'the organized bar,' to defend them. 'But that’s just not happening. And so at a certain point I’ve said to myself, nobody else is going to do this, so I have to defend myself.'


Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement