How About a Dignity Act for Actual Americans?
Congress Is Gearing Up for Their Version of the Purge. Here's Who's on...
Why Everyone Tracking Oil Tanker Traffic Is Pleased to See Where They're Heading
The Inevitable Has Happened for Eric Swalwell
The Locust Left Shows You Who Not to Vote for: A Handy Guide
'Parents Need to Be Aware': High-Profile Transgender Cases Shaping America's Battle Over P...
NATO: No Action, Talk Only
My Generation Cannot Sustain the America Democrats Are Creating
The Insulting DIGNITY Act
Trust Iran? Why?
Critical Race Theory: On the Ropes but Lingering
Goodbye NATO, Hello America First
Funded Silence: Congress Shields Itself While Lecturing Everyone Else
Man Accused of Smuggling 655 Illegal Aliens Sentenced to 8 Years
This New Poll on Iran Is Eye-Opening
Tipsheet

Kyle Rittenhouse's Defense Team Once Again Asks for a Mistrial But with a Twist

Kyle Rittenhouse's Defense Team Once Again Asks for a Mistrial But with a Twist
Sean Krajacic/The Kenosha News via AP

KENOSHA, Wisc. — Kyle Rittenhouse's defense team once again asked Kenosha County Circuit Court Judge Bruce Schroeder on Wednesday to declare a mistrial but without prejudice, meaning prosecutors could retry Rittenhouse if Schroeder grants the request. The previous time the defense asked for a mistrial, it was with prejudice.

Advertisement

The issue stems from what the defense team says the prosecution withheld video evidence from them and were given only given one version of drone footage the prosecution says proves Rittenhouse provoked Joseph Rosenbaum into chasing him.

"We had the video, not the clarity, not the quality, I think that's been conceded. We have done this case in a little bit different manner...We didn't have the quality of evidence that the state had until the case had been closed," said Corey Chirafisi.

Chirafisi said they consulted with Rittenhouse and they want the mistrial without prejudice, "based upon the fact that if we're really trying to get the heart of it, we've watched the video, I can tell you what we think but it doesn't matter what we think because we don't get to present that to the jury anymore."

"We have to ask for this and I'm asking for it. We understand that it's going to be without prejudice...We understand [the state] will do it again. But I think we will all have the same information, the same quality of videos, and I think that is required in a case like this where he's looking at a life sentence, potentially without parole if he's convicted," Chirafisi added.

Advertisement

Schroeder said he will not rule on the motion for a mistrial yet because the jury is still debating and asking about the video in question, but "it will still have to be addressed because the jury saw it here in the courtroom."


Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement