A New Bombshell About Alex Pretti Just Dropped. Here's the Footage...And It Nukes...
Remember the Challenger
Bari Weiss Is Poised to Remove Some Problems, and PolitiFact Again Proves Trump's...
Roy Cooper Wants to Pretend He's Tough on Crime. His Record Tells a...
Shameless Gavin Newsom Pretends He's a Champion of Our Constitutional Rights
President Trump Considering Capping the State Fuel Tax in California
Minnesota District Judge Orders ICE Director to Appear in Court
Two Federal Agents Who Shot Alex Pretti Put on Administrative Leave
Feds Arrest 16 in Minneapolis Including 'Bananas and Rice' Woman
Trump Appoints National Fraud Czar
Fresno Bakery Owner Sentenced to 3 Years for $3.5M SNAP Fraud Scheme
Veterans Affairs To Spend Nearly $5B To Improve Healthcare Facilities
California Man Admits Funding ISIS and Stockpiling Explosive Device
Chinese National Sentenced to Nearly Four Years for Laundering $36.9M in Crypto Scam
California Government Employee Used Dead, Elderly Victims in SNAP Fraud Scheme
Tipsheet

Kyle Rittenhouse's Defense Team Once Again Asks for a Mistrial But with a Twist

Sean Krajacic/The Kenosha News via AP

KENOSHA, Wisc. — Kyle Rittenhouse's defense team once again asked Kenosha County Circuit Court Judge Bruce Schroeder on Wednesday to declare a mistrial but without prejudice, meaning prosecutors could retry Rittenhouse if Schroeder grants the request. The previous time the defense asked for a mistrial, it was with prejudice.

Advertisement

The issue stems from what the defense team says the prosecution withheld video evidence from them and were given only given one version of drone footage the prosecution says proves Rittenhouse provoked Joseph Rosenbaum into chasing him.

"We had the video, not the clarity, not the quality, I think that's been conceded. We have done this case in a little bit different manner...We didn't have the quality of evidence that the state had until the case had been closed," said Corey Chirafisi.

Chirafisi said they consulted with Rittenhouse and they want the mistrial without prejudice, "based upon the fact that if we're really trying to get the heart of it, we've watched the video, I can tell you what we think but it doesn't matter what we think because we don't get to present that to the jury anymore."

"We have to ask for this and I'm asking for it. We understand that it's going to be without prejudice...We understand [the state] will do it again. But I think we will all have the same information, the same quality of videos, and I think that is required in a case like this where he's looking at a life sentence, potentially without parole if he's convicted," Chirafisi added.

Advertisement

Schroeder said he will not rule on the motion for a mistrial yet because the jury is still debating and asking about the video in question, but "it will still have to be addressed because the jury saw it here in the courtroom."


Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement