Online Trolls Call Themselves Experts, but None Match my Expertise in Genocide
How the Dems Plan to Counter the Supreme Court's Ruling on the Voting...
Wait, Eric Swalwell Is Contacting His Accusers?
Here's the Question That Caused Seattle's Mayor to Flee an Interview
Senate Judiciary Committee Advances Bipartisan Bill Banning AI Chatbots for Minors
Seattle Leftists Seek to Sacrifice Children for Their Own Peace and Quiet
A 77-Year-Old Was Beaten in Seattle, and the Mayor Wants to Ban the...
The Hill Pushes Laughable Poll on President Trump's Fitness to Serve
Smith College Faces Title IX Investigation for Admitting Trans Women
Here's an Update on Operation Epic Fury and Project Freedom
Randi Weingarten Isn't Worried About Falling Math or Reading Scores. Here's What She's...
The Guy Who Vetoed Antisemitism Legislation Wants Us to Know He's Deeply Offended...
Guess Why a Chicago Alderman Wants to Charge Walgreens With Crimes
The First Voice a Child Hears
Nick Shirley Says He 'Was Almost Taken Hostage in Cuba'
Tipsheet

Federal Judge Issues Another Ruling Against Trump Administration's Mass Deportation Efforts

Federal Judge Issues Another Ruling Against Trump Administration's Mass Deportation Efforts
Diego M. Radzinschi/ALM via AP

U.S. District Court Judge James Boasberg is refusing to lift a restraining order against the Trump administration prohibiting it from invoking the Alien Enemies Act to deport Venezuelan illegal immigrants.

Advertisement

The judge argued that “the President’s unprecedented use of the Act outside of the typical wartime context … implicates a host of complicated legal issues” such as whether a criminal group like the Tren de Aragua street gang constitutes a “foreign nation or government” as the Alien Enemies Act requires.

Boasberg focused primarily on the lack of due process that occurred during the arrests and deportations of the individuals. The ruling comes after five Venezuelan nationals detained by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) filed a lawsuit in which they claimed they feared imminent deportation after President Donald Trump issued a Proclamation labeling Tren de Aragua as a criminal gang that has engaged in an “invasion or predatory incursion” against the United States.

Boasberg noted that the plaintiffs had a strong likelihood of success in court based on their insistence that they are still entitled to due process. “Before they may be deported, they are entitled to individualized hearings to determine whether the Act applies to them at all,” the judge wrote.

The judge further pointed out that “Because the named Plaintiffs dispute that they are members of Tren de Aragua, they may not be deported until a court has been able to decide the merits of their challenge.”

Advertisement

When the Alien Enemies Act was invoked in the past, it still provided opportunities for hearings even during wartime, Boasberg argued. He noted that President Franklin D. Roosevelt “provide[d] for hearings for arrested alien enemies … in order to permit them to present facts in their behalf.”

Judge Boasberg did note that the Trump administration can still deport Venezuelan illegal immigrants through the regular channels.

Trump’s invocation of the Alien Enemies Act has ginned up debate over whether the law, passed in the 18th century, can apply to illegal immigrants. The original purpose of the law was to empower the president to detain or deport foreigners from countries that are at war with the United States.

The Trump administration has argued that these actions are necessary to protect public safety and to remove dangerous criminals from the country. The White House has been engaged in a back-and-forth with Judge Boasberg, who initially issued the order after over 200 Venezuelan nationals residing in the country illegally were sent to El Salvador under the legislation.

Advertisement

The Justice Department recently refused to grant Boasberg’s demand for more information about the flights that transported the illegals to El Salvador. The agency argued that the court should stop its “continued intrusions” into the executive branch’s authority. It further argued that the judge’s inquiries were “grave encroachments on core aspects of absolute an unreviewable Executive Branch authority relating to national security, foreign relations and foreign policy.”

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos