Minneapolis Hilton Nixing ICE Agent Reservations Is Now Facing the Consequences
California's Government Better Get Ready for the Minnesota Treatment
Trump Just Gave Republicans a Dire Warning About the Midterms
Rand Paul Said This Republican Was Behind the Operation to Topple Venezuelan President
AAG Harmeet Dhillon Puts the Mamdani Administration on Notice Over Marxist Housing Policie...
In Mamdani's New York, the 'Warmth of Collectivism' Looks a Lot Like Anti-White...
A Deep Dive Into Mamdani's Housing Advisor Cea Weaver Shows Just How Dangerous...
North Carolina Let Another Career Criminal Roam Free, and Now a Teacher Is...
Why Hasn't Trump Repealed Biden's $50 Billion Backdoor Business Tax Increase?
Tucker Carlson Once Claimed the U.S. Would Kill Maduro to Push Gay Marriage,...
Dan Bongino Declares War on 'Grifters and Bums' as He Plans to Return...
Rep. Jasmine Crockett Says 'F**k You' to Supreme Court Over Texas Redistricting
Stephen Miller Gives Epic Response When Jake Tapper Starts Freaking Out Over Venezuela
The Long Awaited Trial for Ashli Babbitt, That Never Came
Iran's Solution to the Mass Protests Is a $7 Stimulus Package
Tipsheet

Federal Judge Issues Another Ruling Against Trump Administration's Mass Deportation Efforts

Diego M. Radzinschi/ALM via AP

U.S. District Court Judge James Boasberg is refusing to lift a restraining order against the Trump administration prohibiting it from invoking the Alien Enemies Act to deport Venezuelan illegal immigrants.

Advertisement

The judge argued that “the President’s unprecedented use of the Act outside of the typical wartime context … implicates a host of complicated legal issues” such as whether a criminal group like the Tren de Aragua street gang constitutes a “foreign nation or government” as the Alien Enemies Act requires.

Boasberg focused primarily on the lack of due process that occurred during the arrests and deportations of the individuals. The ruling comes after five Venezuelan nationals detained by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) filed a lawsuit in which they claimed they feared imminent deportation after President Donald Trump issued a Proclamation labeling Tren de Aragua as a criminal gang that has engaged in an “invasion or predatory incursion” against the United States.

Boasberg noted that the plaintiffs had a strong likelihood of success in court based on their insistence that they are still entitled to due process. “Before they may be deported, they are entitled to individualized hearings to determine whether the Act applies to them at all,” the judge wrote.

The judge further pointed out that “Because the named Plaintiffs dispute that they are members of Tren de Aragua, they may not be deported until a court has been able to decide the merits of their challenge.”

Advertisement

When the Alien Enemies Act was invoked in the past, it still provided opportunities for hearings even during wartime, Boasberg argued. He noted that President Franklin D. Roosevelt “provide[d] for hearings for arrested alien enemies … in order to permit them to present facts in their behalf.”

Judge Boasberg did note that the Trump administration can still deport Venezuelan illegal immigrants through the regular channels.

Trump’s invocation of the Alien Enemies Act has ginned up debate over whether the law, passed in the 18th century, can apply to illegal immigrants. The original purpose of the law was to empower the president to detain or deport foreigners from countries that are at war with the United States.

The Trump administration has argued that these actions are necessary to protect public safety and to remove dangerous criminals from the country. The White House has been engaged in a back-and-forth with Judge Boasberg, who initially issued the order after over 200 Venezuelan nationals residing in the country illegally were sent to El Salvador under the legislation.

Advertisement

The Justice Department recently refused to grant Boasberg’s demand for more information about the flights that transported the illegals to El Salvador. The agency argued that the court should stop its “continued intrusions” into the executive branch’s authority. It further argued that the judge’s inquiries were “grave encroachments on core aspects of absolute an unreviewable Executive Branch authority relating to national security, foreign relations and foreign policy.”

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos