Of Course, Politico Says Christmas Is a Right Wing Boogaloo
Ghanaian 'Prophet' Cons Followers Into Building Arks After Predicting Another Great Flood
Former Voice of America Reporter Accused of Assassination Plot Against Exiled Iranian Lead...
BREAKING: President Trump Announces Christmas Day Airstrikes on ISIS in Nigeria
Adam Kinzinger Took Revenge on CBS Over 60 Minutes Drama. There's Just One...
Leftist College Professor Declares This Classic Christmas Movie 'Bigoted'
Michelle Wu Rewrites Boston’s History to Virtue-Signal at Trump
Never Let a Crisis Go to Waste: Aussie Pols Ram Through Bondi Beach-Inspired...
The White House Rejected Catholic Bishops' Immigration Christmas Wish
Nicki Minaj Faces Massive Backlash After Pro-Trump, Pro-Christian Speech at AmericaFest
17,500 Illegal Immigrants Arrested Under the Laken Riley Act
This Democrat is Trying to Rip Trump's Name From an Iconic Building
Justice Department Challenges Illinois Laws It Says Endanger Federal Agents
These Cringey Trans Terrorists Just Got Handed Federal Charges
Former USDA Worker Owes $36M in Restitution for Selling SNAP Data to Criminals
Tipsheet

Federal Judge Issues Another Ruling Against Trump Administration's Mass Deportation Efforts

Diego M. Radzinschi/ALM via AP

U.S. District Court Judge James Boasberg is refusing to lift a restraining order against the Trump administration prohibiting it from invoking the Alien Enemies Act to deport Venezuelan illegal immigrants.

Advertisement

The judge argued that “the President’s unprecedented use of the Act outside of the typical wartime context … implicates a host of complicated legal issues” such as whether a criminal group like the Tren de Aragua street gang constitutes a “foreign nation or government” as the Alien Enemies Act requires.

Boasberg focused primarily on the lack of due process that occurred during the arrests and deportations of the individuals. The ruling comes after five Venezuelan nationals detained by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) filed a lawsuit in which they claimed they feared imminent deportation after President Donald Trump issued a Proclamation labeling Tren de Aragua as a criminal gang that has engaged in an “invasion or predatory incursion” against the United States.

Boasberg noted that the plaintiffs had a strong likelihood of success in court based on their insistence that they are still entitled to due process. “Before they may be deported, they are entitled to individualized hearings to determine whether the Act applies to them at all,” the judge wrote.

The judge further pointed out that “Because the named Plaintiffs dispute that they are members of Tren de Aragua, they may not be deported until a court has been able to decide the merits of their challenge.”

Advertisement

When the Alien Enemies Act was invoked in the past, it still provided opportunities for hearings even during wartime, Boasberg argued. He noted that President Franklin D. Roosevelt “provide[d] for hearings for arrested alien enemies … in order to permit them to present facts in their behalf.”

Judge Boasberg did note that the Trump administration can still deport Venezuelan illegal immigrants through the regular channels.

Trump’s invocation of the Alien Enemies Act has ginned up debate over whether the law, passed in the 18th century, can apply to illegal immigrants. The original purpose of the law was to empower the president to detain or deport foreigners from countries that are at war with the United States.

The Trump administration has argued that these actions are necessary to protect public safety and to remove dangerous criminals from the country. The White House has been engaged in a back-and-forth with Judge Boasberg, who initially issued the order after over 200 Venezuelan nationals residing in the country illegally were sent to El Salvador under the legislation.

Advertisement

The Justice Department recently refused to grant Boasberg’s demand for more information about the flights that transported the illegals to El Salvador. The agency argued that the court should stop its “continued intrusions” into the executive branch’s authority. It further argued that the judge’s inquiries were “grave encroachments on core aspects of absolute an unreviewable Executive Branch authority relating to national security, foreign relations and foreign policy.”

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement