It Seems Like Dems Are Struggling to Handle the Chaos Created by Unterscharführer...
Why a Former SC State Rep Vented About the Supreme Court Ruling on...
Jill Biden's Answer to This Question About the 2024 Election IS NOT What...
Why Graham Platner Had to Return to Maine Quickly Last Night
The Dems Suffering Through Another Wave of Biden-Induced Political Nausea. That's Such a...
We Knew the LA Mayor's Results Wouldn't Be Called, but These Drunk Pratt...
The Left's War on America's 250th
'60 Minutes' Staffers Are Mad Scott Pelley Was Fired for Insubordination
Abby Phillip Lectures Guests About Democrats' Fears President Trump Will Interfere in the...
CENTCOM Disabled a 'Non-Compliant' Vessel in the Arabian Gulf
A Milwaukee Husband and Father Was Beaten to Death by a Career Criminal
Francesca Hong Wants to Control Wisconsin's Budget, but Can't Seem to Manage Her...
The Forgotten Room Heroes
Spencer Pratt Declares He's 'Born For This' After Rough Election Night For Karen...
John Cornyn Is Crashing Out Over His Horrendous Electoral Loss
Tipsheet

Supreme Court to Hear Case That Could Have Significant Ramifications for Federal Immunity

Supreme Court to Hear Case That Could Have Significant Ramifications for Federal Immunity
AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein, File

The Supreme Court has agreed to hear the case of Curtrina Martin, a Georgia resident whose home was wrongly raided by the FBI.

The eventual ruling will determine whether federal agencies can be held civilly liable when their actions adversely affect American citizens.

Advertisement

Martin lived with her fiancé and seven-year-old son back in 2017 when the raid happened. The authorities were trying to apprehend a gang member who lived near the couple.

On an early morning in 2017, Martin and her then-fiance, Hilliard Toi Cliatt, were awoken by the FBI detonating a flash grenade in their home and ripping their door from its hinges. The agents then made their way to their bedroom and found the couple hiding in the closet, where they had retreated in fear; an officer dragged Cliatt out and handcuffed him, while another pointed his gun and screamed at Martin, who says she fell on a rack in the rapidly unfolding mayhem. Her 7-year-old son was in his room, and she says her mind went to a dark place.

"I don't know if there is a proper word that I can use" to capture the fear she felt, Martin told me this summer.

The FBI would not find who they came for, because the suspect didn't live there, nor did he have any relation to Martin or Cliatt. When Martin sued, the 11th Circuit not only gave immunity to Lawrence Guerra, the leader of the SWAT raid, but the judges also said her claims could not proceed under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), the legislation that allows people to bring various state torts against the federal government.

However, there is an exception to the FTCA. Private individuals are allowed to sue the federal government if its agents engage in behavior that a civilian could be held liable for in the state in which the incident occurred, according to SCOTUSBlog.

Advertisement

Martin’s case has drawn the attention of several lawmakers, including Sens. Ron Wyden (D-OR), Rand Paul (R-KY), and Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY). They, along with other lawmakers, have called on the Supreme Court to take up the case.

This could be a landmark case that results in less immunity for federal law enforcement agencies. When these agencies take actions that unduly harm citizens, even if by mistake, there should be recourse. The FBI and other agencies should never be shielded from accountability when they engage in wrongdoing, and the Supreme Court’s ruling will be critical.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos