Biden's New Footwear Confirms the Old and Weak Narrative Surrounding His Presidency
MSNBC's Joe Scarborough Really Earned His Paycheck Yesterday Over Trump's 'Bloodbath' Rema...
Want to Guess How Many Times Google Conducted Election Interference to Help Democrats?
Joe Biden's Political Aphasia Finally Presents Itself
Nation’s Largest Corporate Mega-Stores Lobbying for Billions, Small Businesses & Consumers...
A Truth and Reality ‘Bloodbath’
CAIR Says Biden Will Lose, 'Allah Willing'
Trump Romps Among Battleground Catholics
The Smell of Mendacity
Federal Judge's Ruling That an Illegal Immigrant Can Carry Arms Ignites Debate in...
Congressman Who's Been Rescuing Americans in Haiti Blasts Biden Admin's 'Pattern of Abando...
We Now Know What Will Get One Fired From Harvard
'Bloodbath' and Pure Evil
Pathway to Victory
The Cautionary Legal Tale of Roundup
Tipsheet

Video: Hagel Admits Released Detainees Directed and Planned Attacks Against US Troops


I say "admits" because the Secretary of Defense did a lot of tap dancing to avoid stating the obvious during his testimony yesterday: That these Taliban commanders were, in fact, at war with America. Under questioning from Rep. Mac Thornberry (R-TX), Hagel engaged in intensive hair-splitting on everything from the exact terminology surrounding Bowe Bergdahl's captivity, to the technical definition of negotiating with terrorists, to whether or not the 'Taliban Five' directly took part in attacks against Americans. The key bit comes near the end of this clip:

Advertisement



Hagel: "We have no direct evidence of any direct involvement in their direct attacks on the United States, or any of our troops. They were part of the Taliban at the time...But yes, they were combatants."

Thornberry: "So your point was they didn't pull the trigger, but they were senior commanders of the Taliban military who directed operations against the United States and its coalition partners..."

Hagel: "That's right. That's right. As I said in my statement, they were combatants."


If that was his contention all along, why all the tortured parsing about "direct" evidence of "direct" involvement in "direct" attacks? Perhaps he was trying to downplay the danger these freed detainees really pose, a la Hillary Clinton's bizarre assertion that the 'Taliban Five' are not a threat to Americans -- in spite of their high-risk designation, our intelligence community's candid assessments, and the continued presence of US troops in Afghanistan. (Mrs. Clinton's approval rating has dropped precipitously in recent years, incidentally). Current and former cabinet secretaries may not be willing to articulate this deal's inherent perils for political reasons, but the American people seem to have internalized it on their own. A two-thirds majority expressed concerns about the implications of negotiating with terrorists in a freshly-released poll, even as Hagel denies that any such precedent was set. In fact, he continues to recite the party line the US government didn't negotiate with terrorists at all, since our direct talks were with Qatari intermediaries. This distinction is meaningless. We forged a deal with, and made major concessions to, the Taliban and the Haqqani network, the latter of which is officially classified as a terrorist organization by our government. The Obama administration's sophistry on this point has been betrayed by their own excuses on other fronts. When queried about the nature of the connection between the Taliban and Haqqani, Hagel said he didn't know -- which became a theme of his entire performance:

Advertisement


Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement